ADKO

vietnam

7 min read

The provided text, “The Vietnam ‘War’ by Miles Mathis,” argues that the Vietnam War, like WWI and WWII, was largely a fabricated conflict orchestrated by powerful entities. The author begins by critiquing a recent event involving Trevor Smith at a Turning Points USA rally, suggesting it was staged. He then pivots to his main thesis, stating that the Vietnam War was a continuation of previous staged wars and a “fraud” orchestrated by the US and its allies.

Mathis challenges the mainstream narrative of Russia’s post-war influence in vietnam, claiming it makes no sense given Russia’s prior lack of involvement and China’s geographical proximity. He posits that the US itself was behind both sides of the conflict, providing Ho Chi Minh and the Viet Minh with weapons and training through the OSS (Office of Strategic Services). Mathis suggests Ho Chi Minh was a CIA asset from the 1910s, traveling to the US for training and influenced by Marcus Garvey’s organizations, which he labels as intelligence fronts.

The author further asserts that Ho Chi Minh’s early life was misrepresented to portray him as a revolutionary when he was, in fact, a “Western puppet.” Mathis traces Ho Chi Minh’s movements to London and Paris, where he allegedly became a leader of Vietnamese “Patriots” through connections with “superwealthy spook Tay Ho” and later became a high-ranking member of the Soviet Comintern under Dmitry Manuilsky.

Mathis contends that the Gulf of Tonkin incident was staged, implying the entire war was a manufactured conflict, essentially an Allied occupation disguised as a war. He argues that the US and its allies were fighting themselves, using countries like France, Japan, China, and Russia as fronts. The author criticizes the war’s narrative as a means to justify defense spending for contractors and to mask the British Empire’s continuation under the guise of American global leadership. He also suggests that the use of napalm and Agent Orange was for industrial land clearing rather than combat.

The text questions the population statistics of vietnam during the war, noting a lack of significant decline despite claims of millions of casualties. Mathis introduces Archimedes Patti as a key OSS agent who acted as Ho Chi Minh’s handler. He also discusses Ngo Dinh Diem, the President of South vietnam, portraying him as another CIA asset, similar to Ho Chi Minh. Mathis claims Diem’s rise to power was orchestrated, facilitated by Edward Geary Lansdale of the CIA, who also managed Diem’s political affairs and even lived with him. The author also alleges that Diem’s brother, Nhu, was a Nazi and that the CIA orchestrated Diem’s faked death and assassination.

Mathis concludes by stating that the war was a prolonged staged event for profit and control, highlighting the CIA’s role in preventing elections and exacerbating conflict. He criticizes the alleged “tyranny” of Diem’s rule in the South, contrasting it with the supposed liberation narrative. The text points to Lucien Emile Conein as the CIA agent responsible for Diem’s staged death. Finally, Mathis dismisses the credibility of war photos and mentions the Phoenix Program as an example of overt CIA operations.

Summary with Marked Entities:

The provided text, “The Vietnam ‘War’ by Miles Mathis,” argues that the Vietnam War, like WWI and WWII, was largely a fabricated conflict orchestrated by powerful entities. The author begins by critiquing a recent event involving Trevor Smith at a Turning Points USA rally, suggesting it was staged. He then pivots to his main thesis, stating that the Vietnam War was a continuation of previous staged wars and a “fraud” orchestrated by the US and its allies.

Mathis challenges the mainstream narrative of Russia’s post-war influence in vietnam, claiming it makes no sense given Russia’s prior lack of involvement and China’s geographical proximity. He posits that the US itself was behind both sides of the conflict, providing Ho Chi Minh and the Viet Minh with weapons and training through the OSS (Office of Strategic Services). Mathis suggests Ho Chi Minh was a CIA asset from the 1910s, traveling to the US for training and influenced by Marcus Garvey’s organizations, which he labels as intelligence fronts.

The author further asserts that Ho Chi Minh’s early life was misrepresented to portray him as a revolutionary when he was, in fact, a “Western puppet.” Mathis traces Ho Chi Minh’s movements to London and Paris, where he allegedly became a leader of Vietnamese “Patriots” through connections with “superwealthy spook Tay Ho” and later became a high-ranking member of the Soviet Comintern under Dmitry Manuilsky.

Mathis contends that the Gulf of Tonkin incident was staged, implying the entire war was a manufactured conflict, essentially an Allied occupation disguised as a war. He argues that the US and its allies were fighting themselves, using countries like France, Japan, China, and Russia as fronts. The author criticizes the war’s narrative as a means to justify defense spending for contractors and to mask the British Empire’s continuation under the guise of American global leadership. He also suggests that the use of napalm and Agent Orange was for industrial land clearing rather than combat.

The text questions the population statistics of vietnam during the war, noting a lack of significant decline despite claims of millions of casualties. Mathis introduces Archimedes Patti as a key OSS agent who acted as Ho Chi Minh’s handler. He also discusses Ngo Dinh Diem, the President of South Vietnam, portraying him as another CIA asset, similar to Ho Chi Minh. Mathis claims Diem’s rise to power was orchestrated, facilitated by Edward Geary Lansdale of the CIA, who also managed Diem’s political affairs and even lived with him. The author also alleges that Diem’s brother, Nhu, was a Nazi and that the CIA orchestrated Diem’s faked death and assassination.

Mathis concludes by stating that the war was a prolonged staged event for profit and control, highlighting the CIA’s role in preventing elections and exacerbating conflict. He criticizes the alleged “tyranny” of Diem’s rule in the South, contrasting it with the supposed liberation narrative. The text points to Lucien Emile Conein as the CIA agent responsible for Diem’s staged death. Finally, Mathis dismisses the credibility of war photos and mentions the Phoenix Program as an example of overt CIA operations.

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Backlinks

Graph View