ADKO

unz

24 min read

This document is a response from Miles Mathis to an attack piece written by Ron Unz. Mathis argues that unz’s lengthy critique of his work is baseless, filled with personal attacks, and demonstrates unz’s fear and confusion. Mathis dismisses unz’s arguments about the volume of his work, the use of PDFs, and his alleged connection to Flat Earth as distractions. Mathis asserts that his prolific output is due to his efficient writing process and his commitment to truth, contrasting it with unz’s alleged reliance on lies and worn-out tactics. He also refutes unz’s claim that he is a Mossad agent, suggesting it’s a desperate attempt to discredit him. Mathis further criticizes unz’s background as a wealthy Jewish banker, implying a conflict of interest. The author also speculates that unz’s attack might be part of a larger project, possibly related to Cass Sunstein’s ideas on cognitive infiltration, aimed at creating division and sowing doubt. Mathis concludes by encouraging readers to resist the status quo and not be intimidated by figures like unz and Sunstein. He also critiques the systems of power, corporate influence, and the role of anonymous online agents, advocating for genuine expression and resistance.

Subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc.:

  1. Miles Mathis is responding to a piece by Ron Unz that Mathis deems a “long attack piece” and a “big mistake” on unz’s part.
  2. Mathis criticizes unz for being scared, confused, and making personal attacks rather than addressing Mathis’s actual work.
  3. unz’s criticisms of Mathis’s website are described as superficial, such as his brief visits and his comments on the volume of Mathis’s writing and the use of PDF files.
  4. Mathis defends his use of PDFs and claims his work is heavily footnoted with mainstream references, contradicting unz’s assertion of a lack of links.
  5. Mathis refutes unz’s theory that he is a Mossad agent, citing his prolific output and the censorship he has faced from entities like Google.
  6. Mathis points out unz’s background as a wealthy Jewish banker and suggests this influences his perspective and motives.
  7. The author suggests unz’s attack might be a deliberate tactic, possibly influenced by Cass Sunstein’s ideas on cognitive infiltration, to discredit Mathis and his readers.
  8. Mathis argues that unz’s attempt to portray him as a government project is absurd and counter-productive.
  9. The text details Mathis’s impoverished lifestyle, contrasting it with the supposed lavish resources unz attributes to him, further undermining unz’s claims.
  10. Mathis states that he began publishing his work online after being rejected by traditional outlets and stumbled upon a “Matrix of lies,” which he felt compelled to expose.
  11. He dismisses unz’s arguments about specific papers, such as the one on Arnold Schwarzenegger, as misdirection and focusing on minor details.
  12. The author notes that unz’s critique, and the comments on his site, are largely filled with ad hominem attacks and lack substantive counter-arguments.
  13. Mathis concludes that unz’s attack has backfired, increasing Mathis’s readership and donations, while also exposing the flaws and desperation of his critics.
  14. Mathis suggests unz might be a “Jew controlling the opposition” and criticizes his association with Kevin Barrett.
  15. The text touches upon Mathis’s refusal to take sides in “gender wars, race wars, and party politics,” viewing them as divisive tactics employed by entities like the CIA.
  16. He asserts that the ruling class is morally bankrupt and that economic systems alone cannot solve the underlying problems.

Backlinks

Graph View