ADKO

navalreactor

7 min read

This article critiques the narrative surrounding nuclear marine propulsion, particularly focusing on Admiral Hyman G. Rickover and his role in establishing the U.S. Navy’s nuclear program. The author suggests that the official accounts are fraudulent and that Rickover, portrayed as a difficult but visionary leader, was in fact a “fraud” and a “spook” hired to maintain a facade. The text questions Rickover’s qualifications and rapid rise, highlighting perceived inconsistencies in his early life and career. It argues that Rickover exercised absolute control over the nuclear program through compartmentalization and by creating a self-enclosed system where he reported to himself. The article also casts doubt on the existence and functionality of the claimed nuclear reactors, suggesting that conventional propulsion methods or other undisclosed technologies are likely in use. The author examines the careers of subsequent Directors of Naval Reactors to identify patterns, noting their submarine backgrounds and eventual transitions to roles in corporate or energy sectors. The text concludes by questioning the veracity of photographic evidence and the reported events, such as the USS Enterprise fire, suggesting these are fabricated to support the “nuclear hoax.”

Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Graph View