This article critiques Time magazine’s choice of Taylor Swift as its 2023 Person of the Year, arguing it reflects the publication’s decline into propaganda and irrelevance. The author, Miles Mathis, expresses disbelief at this choice, contrasting it with his own perception of Swift as a “phony, fag-hag, and lipsyncher.” He notes difficulty finding negative commentary on Swift online, attributing this to search engine manipulation. Mathis then broadens his criticism to Time’s past choices, labeling them as “transparent propaganda” and highlighting selections like Greta Thunberg, Ebola Fighters, David Ho, Andy Grove, Peter Ueberroth, and Ted Turner as questionable. He argues that Swift’s selection as a solo pop icon is unprecedented and out of character for the magazine’s history, which has previously avoided pop divas like Madonna, Cher, or Barbra Streisand, only including Bono with the Bill and Melinda Gates as ballast. The author also dissects Time’s selections of “the Guardians” (2018) and “the Silence Breakers” (2017), deeming them “fake news and propaganda.” He specifically debunks the narratives of the Capital Gazette Mass Shooting and the alleged assassination of Jamal Khashoggi, claiming they are fabricated stories intended to manipulate public opinion and promote agendas like the “war on truth.” Mathis alleges that Wendi Winters is still alive, has strong military ties, and that Jamal Khashoggi’s death was faked by CIA-front organizations, linking him to Adnan Khashoggi, Dodi Fayed, Saudi Prince Salman, and the Muslim Brotherhood. He further connects these selections to a broader conspiracy to “split the sexes” through movements like MeToo and the promotion of homosexuality and transsexuality, which he believes serves to control population, boost consumption, and fuel the drug and porn industries. The author concludes that Time’s choices are part of a larger scheme by “evil governors” and “bankers” to manipulate society.

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.: