ADKO

wallace

7 min read

This document, “Alfred Russel Wallace: Singapore 1862” by Miles Mathis, argues that Alfred Russel Wallace was a fraud, similar to Charles Darwin. The author claims that Wallace’s purported middle-class background is a fabrication, and evidence suggests he was from a peerage family with significant connections. Mathis scrutinizes Wallace’s ancestry, pointing to “scrubbed” genealogical records on sites like Geni and Wikitree as indicative of hidden truths. He links Wallace to various aristocratic families, including the Veres, Scotts, Hopes, Stuarts, and Pagets, suggesting a close familial relationship with darwin.

The author contends that Wallace, like darwin, was part of a deliberate “project” and intentionally ceded fame to darwin because he understood the deception. Mathis details Wallace’s alleged aristocratic lineage, including his father, Thomas Vere Wallace, who he claims was the Baron Wallace. He connects this Baron Wallace to Lady Jane Hope, daughter of the 2nd Earl of Hopetoun, and through her, to other prominent families like the Leslies, Erskines, Monypenys, and darwin himself.

The text further explores the Wallace family’s alleged wealth and influence, citing inheritances of estates like Carleton Hall and Featherstone Castle. It highlights Thomas Vere Wallace’s roles as Solicitor General, Attorney General, and Lord of the Admiralty, as well as his position as Master of the Mint and his involvement with the East India Company.

Mathis also examines the symbolism on the Baron Wallace’s crest, an ostrich with a horseshoe in its beak, interpreting it not as a symbol of strength but as one of hiding and “covert operations.” He connects this to the Hebrew letter Teth, representing the Phoenician goddess Tanit, linking it to Jennifer Middleton and the Rosicrucians.

The document then shifts to another wallace baronet, Sir Richard Wallace, who was illegitimately born but linked to the Marquess of Hertford, the Duke of Queensbury, and King George IV through his parentage and mistresses. These connections further entwine the wallace name with powerful families like the Gordons, Hamiltons, Stuarts, Stanleys, Egertons, and Russells.

Mathis asserts that the wallace family’s true origins lie with the wallaces, Lairds of Craigie, Scotland, who have direct lineage to Mary Stewart, daughter of James II. The author draws parallels between wallace and darwin’s early lives, claiming both left school as teenagers and had fabricated apprenticeship stories. He suggests wallace’s time as a surveyor was a cover for intelligence work, likening the Leicester Collegiate School he attended to a front for Intelligence.

The text criticizes wallace’s expeditions to Brazil and Singapore, arguing that his claims of profiting from collecting natural history specimens are false. Mathis proposes that these trips were more likely for espionage and resource assessment. He also questions the veracity of wallace’s shipwrecks and lost specimens, suggesting they were fabricated to obscure his true activities.

Finally, the document alleges that wallace’s naturalist pursuits, particularly his hunting of orangutans and monkeys for profit in Borneo, were driven by a lack of scruples and a desire for wealth, not a love for animals. The author concludes by reiterating his belief that Alfred Russel Wallace was a prominent fraud who fabricated his resume and life story.

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Backlinks

Graph View