This article argues that the Palestine Liberation Organization (plo) was created by British intelligence as a “marionette” to fail and serve British interests, rather than genuinely liberate Palestinians. The author claims the plo’s founding in Jerusalem in 1964 by the Arab League was suspicious, as the Arab League itself was designed to fail. The article points to the plo’s coat of arms, a phoenix, and its name’s potential origin as an inside joke from the film “No Time for Sergeants” as evidence of a Western intelligence fabrication.

The author contends that the plo’s purpose was not liberation but to seek recognition and statehood, and that British dictat dispossessed and displaced Palestinians. The article links the plo and Arab League’s perceived alliance with Mayfair, London, to Israel’s formation via the 1917 Balfour Declaration, which originated from England and was promoted by Lord Rothschild. The article suggests the plo charter’s nullification of the Balfour Declaration is contradictory to this alleged alliance.

The author identifies the plo’s first chairman, Ahmad Shukeiri, as an Ottoman Turk with British ties, who also had a career in Washington D.C. and served as a UN delegate and Arab League head. Yasser Arafat is identified as a British “stooge” and Jew operating under a fake name, Abdul Rahman al-Husseini, whose mother was allegedly a Saud from the ruling family of Saudi Arabia. This connection to the House of Saud is explored, with the author suggesting the family’s origins and history are obscure and tied to British influence and the East India Company.

The article further speculates about the Ottoman origins, linking them to Phoenicians and suggesting their leaders were not genuinely Muslim but “children of El.” The author claims the British Empire was behind the rise of the Saudi monarchy, controlling vital oil fields, and that current Saudi royals are manufactured figures similar to American billionaires.

The article revisits the Balfour Declaration, dismissing Lord Rothschild’s involvement as a smokescreen and asserting the declaration’s true purpose was to establish a British military presence in Palestine for resource protection, particularly oil. The author argues that the creation of Israel was not about a Jewish homeland but a Hollywood-esque facade for military interests, driven by British knowledge of oil reserves prior to WWI.

The article concludes by suggesting that WWI and WWII were not about their officially stated causes but were rather orchestrated by the British for resource control and regional dominance, pointing to the British declaration of war on the Ottoman Empire in 1914 as evidence of their focus on Palestine and its resources. The article also touches on the Oslo Accords in 1993, portraying them as a deliberate act by the plo to sabotage the Palestinian movement and further diminish their land claims.

List of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc: