This article argues that the alleged attack on Paul Pelosi was staged and fake, orchestrated by intelligence agencies to manipulate public opinion and benefit the Democratic Party. The author, Miles Mathis, claims that the alleged attacker, David Depape, is a fabricated persona with no verifiable background. Mathis points to inconsistencies in Depape’s public information, claiming his online presence has been scrubbed and his relatives are difficult to trace, suggesting CIA involvement.

The author further asserts that Depape’s purported beliefs, such as being a 11 truther and questioning election integrity and vaccine safety, are meant to discredit these viewpoints and create sympathy for Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats, whom Mathis believes are facing electoral defeat.

Mathis meticulously deconstructs the official narrative by tracing the supposed connections between David Depape, his relatives (including Ronald Depape, Gene Depape, and Teresa Depape), and various influential families like the Forbes and Wallaces, and even suggesting links to the CIA. He also delves into the background of Gypsy Taub, who allegedly lived with Depape, portraying her as a complex figure with connections to wealth, MIT, and a controversial public persona, all while suggesting her actions served to “blackwash” movements like 11 Truth.

The article scrutinizes the details of the alleged attack, questioning the survival of Paul Pelosi, the security measures (or lack thereof) at the Pelosi residence, and the timeline of events. Mathis highlights the supposed contradictory information released by law enforcement and media outlets, including details about the number of hammers, the state of Depape’s attire, and the circumstances of police arrival. He suggests that the narrative is being manipulated and that the “actors” involved are likely intelligence operatives or doubles.

Mathis concludes by proposing that David Depape might be related to the pelosi family, citing various genealogical connections and suggesting that the entire incident was a staged event, an “inside job” designed to influence politics and media narratives. He also draws parallels to other events like the uvalde shooting and questions the authenticity of released video evidence, claiming it is staged and contradictory. The author uses the example of Alice Procope, her alleged connection to Tom Parker Bowles, and the British aristocracy to illustrate how these elaborate webs of connections are used to obscure truths and manipulate public perception.

Here is a list of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc. from the text: