This article, “The Most Rigged Election Ever” by Miles Mathis, argues that the 2022 election was intentionally manipulated, not to ensure a full Democratic Party victory, but to prevent a “red wave” and keep the public off-balance, potentially pushing towards civil war. Mathis claims the election was stolen in the opposite manner of 2020, with an early, exaggerated lead for Democratic candidates, rather than a late surge. He cites the unexpected early leads of candidates like Fetterman, Lake, and Warnock, and the subsequent narrowing of those leads, as evidence of this manipulation. Mathis dismisses explanations like mail-in ballots and Covid-19, suggesting the early leads are only explainable by computer manipulation, a “computer gift” to make races unassailable.
He also points to a AP poll run by the University of Chicago with a large sample size, which indicated a significant surge in “conservatism” and dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party, contradicting the official election results. Mathis compares this to his own 2012 analysis, where he claims rigged numbers masked the true partisan leanings. The author believes the election outcome was orchestrated by entities operating out of Langley, potentially the CIA, in collaboration with major banks and the Democratic National Committee (excluding pelosi). He speculates this manipulation was intended to create widespread disappointment and prevent a genuine shift in power, as he believes Republican politicians are also beholden to higher powers.
Mathis suggests this blatant rigging, while intended to incite civil war by frustrating the masses, may backfire on the manipulators. He argues that the collapse of the mainstream media and a weakened military morale mean the intended narrative control might fail, leading to a “pivot point in history” where the architects of this instability could lose control. He concludes by stating that while the manipulators are aware of this risk, their addiction to power and chaos prevents them from changing course.
Here is a list of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc., marked with double square brackets:
The article argues that the 2022 election was intentionally manipulated, not to ensure a full Democratic Party victory, but to prevent a “red wave” and keep the public off-balance, potentially pushing towards civil war. Mathis claims the election was stolen in the opposite manner of 2020, with an early, exaggerated lead for Democratic Party candidates like Fetterman, Kari Lake, and Warnock, rather than a late surge. He cites these unexpected early leads and subsequent narrowing as evidence of manipulation. Mathis dismisses explanations like mail-in ballots and Covid-19, suggesting the early leads are only explainable by computer manipulation, a “computer gift.”
He also points to a AP poll run by the University of Chicago with a large sample size, which indicated a significant surge in “conservatism” and dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party, contradicting the official election results. Mathis compares this to his own 2012 analysis, where he claims rigged numbers masked the true partisan leanings. The author believes the election outcome was orchestrated by entities operating out of Langley, potentially the CIA, in collaboration with major banks and the Democratic National Committee (excluding Nancy Pelosi). He speculates this manipulation was intended to create widespread disappointment and prevent a genuine shift in power, as he believes Republican politicians are also beholden to higher powers.
Mathis suggests this blatant rigging, while intended to incite civil war by frustrating the masses, may backfire on the manipulators. He argues that the collapse of the mainstream media and a weakened military morale mean the intended narrative control might fail, leading to a “pivot point in history” where the architects of this instability could lose control. He concludes by stating that while the manipulators are aware of this risk, their addiction to power and chaos prevents them from changing course.
The article also mentions Mike Lindell, Publius 2.0, Bill Gates, desantis, Florida, Trump, Maricopa County, Bolduc, Zeldin, Obama, Romney, Hochul, and Whitmer. The author refers to the CIA’s own newspaper, the Washington Post, and discusses the elections in Arizona. He contrasts the 2022 election manipulation with what he claims happened in 2020. The author also references the idea of “Operation Chaos.”