ADKO

bounty

5 min read

This text argues that the historical accounts of the Mutiny on the Bounty are fabricated to conceal the true purpose of the expedition: the violent subjugation of Hawaii. The author questions the plausibility of William Bligh’s command and age, his family background, and his rapid promotions, suggesting he was part of the British aristocracy and intelligence. The text asserts that Bligh and Fletcher Christian were likely related and acting as agents, staging a “play” to cover up the real mission. The breadfruit story is dismissed as a pretext, and the author posits that the Bounty was an armed vessel sent to Hawaii to avenge Captain Cook’s death and conquer the islands, a mission that involved extreme violence and was subsequently hidden by a fabricated mutiny narrative. The author also critiques the portrayal of the event in films, the discovery of the Bounty’s wreckage, and the subsequent history of Hawaii and its royal lineage, suggesting that key figures like John Young might have been Fletcher Christian. The author concludes by suggesting that the dimensions and armament of the Bounty have been deliberately misrepresented to make the mutiny story seem more plausible.

Here is the summary with the requested annotations:

This text argues that the historical accounts of the Mutiny on the Bounty are fabricated to conceal the true purpose of the expedition: the violent subjugation of Hawaii. The author questions the plausibility of William Bligh’s command and age, his family background, and his rapid promotions, suggesting he was part of the British aristocracy and British Intelligence. The text asserts that Bligh and Fletcher Christian were likely related and acting as agents, staging a “play” to cover up the real mission. The breadfruit story is dismissed as a pretext, and the author posits that the bounty was an armed vessel sent to Hawaii to avenge Captain James Cook’s death and conquer the islands, a mission that involved extreme violence and was subsequently hidden by a fabricated mutiny narrative. The author also critiques the portrayal of the event in films, the discovery of the bounty’s wreckage, and the subsequent history of Hawaii and its royal lineage, suggesting that key figures like John Young might have been Fletcher Christian. The author concludes by suggesting that the dimensions and armament of the bounty have been deliberately misrepresented to make the mutiny story seem more plausible.

Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Backlinks

Graph View