ADKO

vahey

6 min read

Here’s a summary of the text with the requested annotations:

The author Miles Mathis argues that a story published by The Guardian in 2016, titled “How did one of the worst paedophiles in history get away with his crimes?”, is a fabrication. Mathis points to the author, Robert Booth, as a clue, suggesting his family has a history of faking events, citing John Wilkes Booth and the lincoln assassination. Mathis also notes that Robert Booth has been heavily promoting the “coronahoax.”

Mathis claims the story about vahey contains numerological markers. He mentions that vahey taught at Southbank International School in London, which allegedly had students aged 11 to 18. Mathis contests this, stating Wikipedia claims Southbank has students aged 3 to 18, implying the numbers were manipulated.

The author suggests looking for vahey under similar spellings like Fahey or Fahie in genealogy records and brings up other prominent individuals named vahey, including Michael Vahey of Hughes Aircraft, Raytheon, and DARPA, and John Vahey, the defense attorney for Sacco and Vanzetti, implying a history of deception.

Mathis criticizes the description of Southbank International School as catering to the children of the wealthy, including a billionaire hedge fund manager, Russian oil executives, and diplomats from the US, Kuwait, and Oman embassies. He notes that Southbank is owned by Cognita, a private company that owns 67 schools globally, and is now owned by Bregal Capital, a private equity firm. Mathis speculates that such schools serve as “spook-feeder schools” to train future agents.

The author highlights the claim that vahey, the son of an Air Force pilot, attended US Defense Department schools in England and Japan, suggesting he was a “spook” from the start. Mathis believes the creation of schools like Southbank caters to the wealthy who may not want their children attending military bases.

Mathis finds the assertion that vahey drugged boys and molested them in their sleep, leaving victims unsure if it happened, to be a “brilliant” story designed to create widespread fear and psychological manipulation, fitting into a “New World Disorder.”

Further skepticism is raised about the account of pupils trashing Vahey’s classroom, questioning the unnamed “source.” Mathis dismisses the claim of Vahey’s conviction for child molestation and a 90-day sentence in California 50 years prior, stating there is no record. He points out inconsistencies in the details of this alleged conviction, including the number of boys and the dates. He also questions how California lost track of vahey for registration purposes.

Mathis ridicules the story of Vahey’s housekeeper in Nicaragua stealing incriminating pictures from his computer using a flash drive and presenting them to the headmistress, Dr. Gloria Doll, calling the name and scenario implausible and akin to a James Bond plot. He questions a housekeeper’s technical abilities and the subsequent actions of Dr. Doll, who allegedly fired vahey instead of calling the police, allowing him to flee to Miami where the FBI also allegedly let him go. The author finds it highly improbable that vahey would then travel to Luverne, Minnesota, to commit suicide in a hotel.

Mathis asserts that the sequence of events, involving the housekeeper, headmistress, and FBI, would not realistically occur. He also links Luverne, Minnesota to Hollywood/CIA connections, citing its use as a backdrop for films like Fargo and The War, and the birthplace of James Russell Wiggins, executive editor of The Washington Post and Ambassador to the United Nations, suggesting The Washington Post is a CIA publication.

The author notes Vahey’s supposed residence in a beach house on Hilton Head and his wife Jean’s role as director of the European Council of International Schools (or ECIS, Educational Collaborative for International Schools). Mathis suggests Robert Booth may have misidentified the organization, but highlights that ECIS has an “International Taskforce for Child Protection.” He questions the irony of the director’s husband being a major pedophile and proposes that William Vahey may have faked his death, and that ECIS could be using the story for fundraising.

Mathis criticizes the lack of any actual trial for these allegations, allowing Booth and his sources to fabricate stories without accountability. He then analyzes a story about a person referred to as “John” in Indonesia, detailing alleged drugging and molestation of teenage sons’ friends during sleepovers with Oreo cookies. Mathis finds the boys’ continued participation in sleepovers and their inability to voice suspicions unbelievable, given the alleged circumstances. He also questions John’s description of feeling helpless and his inability to speak to his parents before the incident.

Mathis further scrutinizes the account of John’s parents and the headmaster, Niall Nelson, allegedly burying the allegations, and notes Niall Nelson’s subsequent consultancy role for international schools, questioning the plausibility of his inaction given the circumstances.

The author disputes the claim that Southbank School could only obtain Vahey’s US criminal record if he supplied it himself, deeming it “incredible bollocks” and pointing to the existence of international consumer reporting agencies.

Finally, Mathis dismisses a story about vahey leading trips and hosting slideshows featuring pictures of boys in swim trunks and a girl in a bikini, along with a “babe magnet award” for a 13-year-old boy, as unbelievable. He questions the lack of action at the time by the principal, Terry Hedger, who allegedly protected vahey. Mathis also notes Booth’s contradiction regarding mandatory criminal record checks for new teachers. He concludes by questioning the credibility of Scotland Yard’s findings of 53 boys in Vahey’s files and the parents’ decisions not to inquire about their sons’ inclusion.

Here is the list of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc.:

Backlinks

Graph View