ADKO

steiner

7 min read

Here’s a summary of the provided text, with the requested elements marked:

This article by Miles Mathis argues that Rudolf Steiner and his philosophy of Anthroposophy are fraudulent, essentially an offshoot of Theosophy and “just as spooky.” Mathis claims to have intuited this from the name “Anthroposophy” itself, viewing such coinages as a sign of Modernism and a lack of genuine intelligence. He believes Steiner’s ideas, particularly regarding gnomes, are a deliberate attempt to confuse and indoctrinate people, especially children through Waldorf schools.

Mathis delves into Steiner’s alleged Jewish heritage, citing common Jewish surnames in Steiner’s lineage like Lorenz, steiner, Blie, Scheller, and Bogner, and suggests that his genealogy is intentionally obscured. He further connects Steiner to privileged and influential circles through his father’s alleged connections to Count von Hoyos, Ludwig Graf, Robert Whitehead (inventor of the torpedo and owner of a submarine company), Vickers (a British arms conglomerate), and the family of Otto von Bismarck-Schoenhausen. Mathis suggests Steiner was “chosen from the crib” for his role.

The author also traces extensive familial and professional connections of Robert Whitehead, linking him to numerous aristocratic and wealthy British families, and through marriage, to the von Trapp singers and Prince Herbert von Bismarck. This extensive web of connections, Mathis argues, explains Steiner’s seemingly improbable academic achievements, such as a scholarship to the Vienna Institute of Technology and a PhD in Philosophy without an undergraduate degree. He suggests these credentials were “rubberstamped by Intelligence.”

Steiner’s university professor, Franz von Brentano, is described as a “crypto-Jew” with ties to wealthy Italian merchants, the Bellinis, Mattonis, von Laroches, von Stadion-Warthausens, von Birkenstocks, von Hays, von Rottenhofs, von Schonborns, von Sonnenfels, Heinzelmanns, and Gutermanns. The von Stadion-Warthausens are noted as top bankers in Austria, and Bettina von Arnim (Brentano’s aunt) is mentioned as a friend of Goethe and beethoven. Joseph von Sonnenfels, a relative, is identified as a leader of the Illuminati movement in Austria and a Kabbalist who influenced Empress Maria Theresa.

Mathis criticizes Steiner’s philosophy, particularly his ideas on morality and freedom, as expressed in “Philosophy of Spiritual Activity.” He argues that Steiner conflates epistemology with ethics and promotes a relativistic view of morality, urging introspection to avoid external realities and attributing personal failures to internal flaws rather than societal manipulation. Mathis contrasts this with his own view that actions are primary and that societal “garbage” from entities like the “Phoenicians” is the true source of individual problems.

Steiner’s wife, Marie von Sivers, is presented as a “handler” and “enabler,” with her aristocratic von Sievers lineage linked to Russian royalty and nobility. Mathis speculates Steiner may have been gay, citing his views on the female body and future human evolution.

The article also points to Steiner’s association with figures like Wilhelm Liebknecht, Kurt Eisner, and Rosa Luxemburg, labeling them as “Jewish agents” involved in World War I and the declaration of the Socialist Republic in Germany. He also lists Ludwig Jacobowski, Else Lasker-Schüler, Peter Hille, Stefan Zweig, Käthe Kollwitz, Erich Mühsam, Paul Scheerbart, Frank Wedekind, and Otto Erich Hartleben as “Jewish agents.”

Mathis dismisses Steiner’s claims of clairvoyance, particularly concerning gnomes, salamanders, and other spiritual beings, as fictional propaganda designed to frighten and confuse. He contrasts Steiner’s visions with his own extensive dream experiences, which he finds to be wish fulfillment or fantasy, not terrifying encounters. He likens Steiner’s approach to the fear-inducing themes in movies like Altered States and philosophical works like Sartre’s “Nausea,” which he sees as Phoenician propaganda.

The author contends that Anthroposophy, like Theosophy, aims to undermine Christianity by “watering it down” and separating it from its source, and criticizes Steiner’s prediction of a second coming in 1933 not as a personal return but on an “etheric plane,” linking this to the arrival of Hitler, whom he calls “the ultimate gnome.”

The article also scrutinizes Friedrich Rittelmeyer, a figure associated with the Christian Community, arguing he is another “crypto-Jewish spook.” Rittelmeyer’s academic work on Nietzsche and his teachers like Adolf von Harnack (linked to Gnosticism and Kaiser Wilhelm) are highlighted, as are connections to Rockefeller ({{Arvid Harnack}}) and Mildred Fish. The Christian Community itself is characterized as linked to Gnosticism and German New Humanism, and was eventually banned by Hitler as Jewish and Masonic.

Finally, Mathis notes that Anthroposophy and the Goetheanum do not actively resist the “Coronahoax” and are instead incorporating concepts like ai and transhumanism into their philosophy, which he believes would horrify Goethe. He analyzes Steiner’s “mantric verses,” particularly those for Easter, suggesting the word “Sun” could be replaced with “Lucifer” to reveal Steiner’s true intent. The author concludes that Steiner’s work is a deliberate attempt to “keep you confused” while his own work aims to “air you out.”

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Backlinks

Graph View