ADKO

shroyer

3 min read

Here’s a summary of the text with the requested annotations:

The author, Miles Mathis, criticizes Larry Johnson of Gateway Pundit for his recent article on the 11 attacks, interpreting Johnson’s piece as a “controlled op” and an attempt to prove Mathis’s point about alternative media sites. Mathis highlights Johnson’s past as a “former” CIA analyst and State Department employee who worked in the Office of CounterTerrorism, which Mathis labels the “Office of Propaganda.” Johnson, who admits to being a paid pundit for the mainstream 11 narrative on the day of the attacks, has recently resurfaced to defend it again. Mathis points to the overwhelmingly negative comments on Johnson’s article as evidence of public rejection, despite potential bot interference.

Mathis characterizes Johnson’s writing style as “awful,” citing his derogatory comments about his own sister and his dismissive references to a dead major general. He also questions Johnson’s anecdotes about being en route to golf and receiving a call from Katie Couric while at the urinal, suggesting Johnson might be “vaccine damaged.” Johnson’s “proof” for the mainstream 11 Pentagon narrative includes claims from “agent buddies” and the presentation of “fake wreckage” photos.

The author then quotes comments from readers that criticize Johnson’s position. These comments question the lack of plane wreckage for Building 7’s collapse and express skepticism about the honesty of DEA and FBI associates. One commenter suggests Johnson is fulfilling a CIA obligation to support the official narrative while maintaining “street creds” by occasionally going counter-narrative, as with his writings on Ukraine. This commenter has deleted links to Johnson’s homepage, stating “once CIA, always CIA.” Another comment reiterates the suspicion that CIA-authored articles on Gateway Pundit are problematic. The comment also equates DEA, FBI, and CIA with propaganda, and suggests “Larry or Lawrence” might be French for propaganda.

The author also mentions Donald C. Canestraro, a DEA associate of Johnson’s, who was employed by the Office of Military Commissions and allegedly involved in “BS” regarding the hijackers. A link to Canestraro’s declaration on en.wikisource.org is provided. The author dismisses theories about Directed Energy Weapons (DEW) being responsible for the towers’ collapse, arguing for controlled demolition.

Mathis then introduces Walter Neville, who he claims is a relative of the Stanleys and Stuarts known for leading disinformation campaigns since the 1400s. Neville reportedly claims to have witnessed Building 7’s fall, worked at Ground Zero, and was present at Shanksville and witnessed the lincoln assassination.

Finally, Mathis brings up Infowars and its correspondent Owen Shroyer, who has allegedly been sentenced to eight weeks for an unspecified offense. He notes that Shroyer’s attorney, Norm Pattis, also represented Alex Jones and Joe Biggs, questioning the effectiveness of this legal representation given the outcomes. Mathis speculates that the shroyer story, like others, is fabricated to intimidate people into silence. He also briefly mentions Bill Gates in relation to Pattis’s appearance.

Annotated List:

Backlinks

Graph View