ADKO

self2

5 min read

This document is a lengthy response from Miles Mathis to an article attacking his work and personal life, specifically his genealogy. Mathis claims the article was written by a hired professional, whom he dubs “KevinII,” working for an intelligence agency, possibly Langley. He refutes KevinII’s claims point by point, including accusations of him being a “limited hangout,” gay, and having a fabricated genealogy. Mathis asserts that KevinII’s research is flawed, based on speculation and misrepresentation, and that his sources are inaccessible to ordinary people, suggesting forgery or manufactured evidence. He argues that his own life and career demonstrate the opposite of KevinII’s claims, highlighting his lack of mainstream success and his independent research methods. Mathis concludes that the attack has backfired, increasing his readership and demonstrating his resilience against such operations. He also addresses a separate attack by “Robert Zherunkel,” identifying him as a fake British intelligence operative and further illustrating the pattern of anonymous, unsubstantiated attacks against him.

Here is a list of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc., marked with double square brackets:

Miles Mathis refutes an attack by a professional writer, dubbed “KevinII,” whom he suspects works for Langley. Mathis claims this writer, using the pseudonym Kevin Starr (originally Kevin S.), is attempting to discredit him by fabricating a genealogy and making personal accusations. Mathis argues that KevinII’s methods are typical of psychological operations, citing phrases like “outside of my pay grade” and “let’s power through this” as indicators. He points out the inconsistency in KevinII’s claims, such as implying Mathis is a fake persona while also suggesting he is too significant to be targeted.

Mathis defends his personal life, refuting claims of being gay by pointing to his artistic focus on female subjects and his past marriage to mary. He details his modest financial background, living in Austin, Hyde Park, and Taos, NM, and his humble beginnings in Lubbock. He contrasts his own lack of wealth and mainstream promotion with the implied connections of those attacking him, suggesting that if he were truly connected, his artwork and writings would be more widely recognized.

The author challenges KevinII’s genealogical research, stating that it relies on paid ancestry sites with inaccessible sources and lacks verifiable links. He specifically disputes claims about his maternal grandparents living in Amarillo on Alvarado St. and Broadmoor, and his paternal grandfather Roland Williams, or Moses Mordecai Williams, and his wife Dovie. Mathis provides his own detailed recollections of his family’s financial situation and living conditions, emphasizing their ordinary status. He also questions the claims about his great-grandparents, Ramey and Werne, and Lucy Werne and Elijah Hill, noting inconsistencies and the lack of verifiable evidence.

Mathis suggests that the attackers, including Mark Tokarski and entities at POM, are part of a coordinated effort to smear him because his work challenges established narratives on topics like Hitler, Kennedy, lenin, Castro, lincoln, and Rockefeller. He dismisses accusations of misdirecting from the Holocaust by stating he has debunked the Nazis themselves and World War I and World War II as managed events.

He also critiques a separate attack by “Robert Zherunkel,” identifying this as a fake name, possibly from MI6, used to attack him. Mathis reiterates his independence from any such operations, highlighting his ability to produce extensive, well-supported work without institutional backing, contrasting it with the unsubstantiated claims of his attackers. He notes that even Google has reportedly removed him from searches, while other platforms like Bing and Yahoo still rank his work highly.

Mathis concludes that these attacks, including those on his family, are cowardly attempts to silence him, but they have failed. He believes his work and readership continue to grow, citing the creation of a forum, “Defending Miles Mathis,” as evidence that the operations against him are backfiring. He emphasizes his commitment to truth and his invulnerability due to his honesty and unique abilities.

Additional details mentioned:

Graph View