This article by Miles Mathis critiques the historical narrative surrounding Darwin and the theory of Evolution, arguing it was part of a larger, orchestrated project by a hidden elite, rather than a genuine scientific discovery. The author contends that the conflict between religion and science, particularly regarding creation, was manufactured to sow division and advance a secular, state-controlled agenda. Mathis traces this agenda back to figures like Robert Chambers, Jeremy Bentham, and John Stuart Mill, highlighting their alleged connections to “cloaked Jews” and powerful families who manipulated public discourse. He scrutinizes the biographies of prominent figures like Thomas Huxley and Richard Owen, claiming their accomplishments and origins are deliberately obscured to conceal their true allegiances and fabricated roles. The article also questions the validity of dinosaur fossils and their discovery, suggesting a deliberate misrepresentation of facts for unknown purposes. Ultimately, Mathis posits that the promotion of Evolution was a government project, not a scientific one, designed to undermine traditional beliefs and establish a new, state-centric worldview.
Here’s a list of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc., marked as requested:
The article argues that Charles Darwin and the theory of Evolution were part of a manufactured conflict between religion and science, orchestrated by a hidden elite to promote a secular, state-controlled agenda. The author, Miles Mathis, believes this agenda has roots dating back to the Phoenicians and involves a pattern of division and deception.
Mathis criticizes the biographies of key figures, suggesting their achievements and backgrounds are fabricated or deliberately obscured. He examines Robert Chambers and his book Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, calling him a “creep” and a “cloaked Jew.” Chambers’ family connections are linked to Augustus Lehmann (a Jewish banker), Oppenheims, Levis, Freuds, and the Campbell baronets. His daughter married a Priestley.
Jeremy Bentham, described as an “especially loathsome character,” is linked to John Stuart Mill and his father, James Mill (also referred to as James Milne or Milners). James Mill was a colonial administrator for the East India Company and a proponent of British imperialism and the “civilising mission” in India. He wrote History of British India. John Stuart Mill’s father, James Mill, was also linked to Jeremy Bentham. Jeremy Bentham’s family had strong Tory ties, with his brother Samuel Bentham being Prince Potemkin’s business manager. Potemkin was the consort of Catherine the Great of Russia. Bentham’s family wealth came from drapery, and his mother was allegedly a Woodward or a Farr, linking to Abbot barons and Gibbs baronets.
Mathis points to Sir Walter Scott as an associate of Chambers. The Westminster Review and the London Review are identified as platforms for these ideas, with Sir William Molesworth being the owner of these publications after James Mill’s death. Molesworth was Secretary of State under Palmerston and had connections to the Smyth bankers and George Treby. He also links to Sir William Salusbury-Trelawney, Seymour Dukes, and Edward Trelawney. The Molesworth coat of arms is analyzed for symbolism related to the Phoenicians, Tanit, Astarte, and Ra. Molesworth is also credited with promoting Thomas Hobbes’s books.
Thomas Huxley is a central figure, with Mathis calling him a “fraud” and noting his association with the Westminster Review where he coined the term “Darwinism.” Huxley allegedly worked with John Tyndall to promote darwin’s ideas. Huxley’s background is presented as suspicious, with his early education and naval service questioned. He is linked to Edward Forbes, a banker from the Isle of Man, and through his family to the Dalston baronets, Ramsdens, Powletts, Dukes of Bolton, Scotts, Dukes of Monmouth, Coventry barons, Scropes, Earls of Sunderland, Paulets, Marquesses of Winchester, Montagus, and Vanes, Dukes of Cleveland. George Huxley, Commissary-General of the Musters, is mentioned as a key to uncovering these connections.
The article discusses the alleged “debate” between Thomas Huxley and Samuel Wilberforce, calling it a “myth” and suggesting Wilberforce won. Balfour Stewart, an astronomer and head of the Kew observatory, is cited as claiming Wilberforce won. Fitzroy, captain of the Beagle, is mentioned as being present and denouncing darwin’s book. Leslie Groves is used as a point of comparison for Fitzroy. Richard Owen, who coined the term “dinosaur,” is also scrutinized for his purported fabricated biography and potential aristocratic connections to Philipps baronets, Perrots, Darcys, and Tudor kings.
The article questions the existence and dating of dinosaur bones, citing their use in Chinese traditional medicine as “dragon bones.” It references an NBCnews.com article and Dong Zhiming, a scientist, for their accounts. The geological history of China and the alleged burial depths of fossils are also questioned. The article mentions Gideon Algernon Mantell and his discovery of Iguanodon teeth, which Georges Cuvier identified as rhinoceros teeth. Mantell’s wife allegedly found the teeth in Cuckfield, West Sussex, an area that the article claims was underwater during the Jurassic and Cretaceous periods.
The role of liberal theologians in supporting darwin is highlighted, specifically mentioning Frederick Temple, who later became Archbishop of Canterbury. Temple’s family connections include the Temple baronets, George Howard, 6th Earl of Carlisle, Dorothy Cavendish, 5th Duke of Devonshire, Egertons, Leveson-Gowers, Spencers, Russells, Powletts, Paulets, Scropes, and Byrons. Temple’s essay in Essays and Reviews is discussed, as are the essays by Rowland Williams (professor of Hebrew) and Henry Bristow Wilson, who were charged with heresy. The Convocation of Canterbury and Archbishops of Canterbury and York are mentioned in relation to the condemnation of these theologians. Meyrick Goulburn is also briefly mentioned.
The article refers to Alfred Russel Wallace and Joseph Dalton Hooker as collaborators or influences on darwin. John Vaughan Thompson is credited with discovering barnacles as crustaceans. Lyell and George Martin are also mentioned in the context of darwin’s work and the Beatles, respectively.
The article also touches upon the American Constitution and Declaration of Independence, Orwell, Henry VIII, the French Revolution, Pope, and Deadpool. References are made to historical periods like the Mesozoic, Triassic, Jurassic, Cretaceous, and Cenozoic. The Royal Society, Royal Navy, Royal Academy, University of London, East India Company, Beagle, HMS Rattlesnake, Kew observatory, Linnean Society, London Zoo, and Cambridge University Press are mentioned. Other individuals like Fauci, Charles Dickens, H. Ross Perot, William Pitt, Ramses, Sir Alex Stoddart, Philippe Faraut, Alex Stoddart, Linnaeus, Alan Smith, Sir William Gordon Smith, Kennedy of Ballycastle, George Washington, Prince Potemkin, and Mirabeau are also included. The essay mentions Masonic symbols and Beelzebub.