This text argues that the mystery of the Holy Grail has been deliberately obscured by various cultural narratives and fictional works, such as Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code, Raiders of the Lost Ark, and Monty Python and the Holy Grail. The author, Miles Mathis, claims to have solved the mystery through his genealogy work and research into the Phoenicians. He posits that the “Holy Grail” refers to royal bloodlines and that these bloodlines have been intentionally hidden from the public. Mathis asserts that many prominent figures in government, science, art, and Hollywood are closely related and descend from ancient ruling families, tracing them back to William the Conqueror and Charlemagne, and ultimately to Rome and Phoenicia.
The author suggests that Dan Brown’s works were specifically created to divert attention from Mathis’s own research, which began around 2000. Mathis hypothesizes that Dan Brown himself might be a Kohen based on genealogical data. He further claims that historical figures like Charlemagne were Phoenician and that the Merovingian dynasty, linked to The Matrix, traces back to the Julio-Claudian dynasty of Rome, and ultimately to Phoenician founders of Troy.
The text then delves into a theory about humanity’s origins, suggesting that humans may have originated from a planet with more water and a warmer climate, possibly Saturn. Mathis criticizes mainstream science for its misrepresentations and control by Jews. He discusses the Phoenician symbol for Saturn and its connection to the Hebrew letter ‘L’, representing the god El (also known as Ba’al and later Saturn). This symbol, he claims, is also linked to the East India Company and ancient representations of Jesus, suggesting Phoenician infiltration of the Vatican.
A significant portion of the text is dedicated to refuting theories presented by David Icke, David Talbott, and Immanuel Velikovsky, particularly concerning Saturn and cosmic catastrophes. Mathis labels these individuals as “controlled opposition” and argues that their theories are designed to discredit non-mainstream ideas and prevent genuine understanding. He contrasts his own approach, which he claims is based on rigorous mathematical analysis and direct critique of scientific theories, with their reliance on mythology and speculation.
Mathis concludes by re-emphasizing that the “Holy Grail” represents Phoenician and Phoenician bloodlines and that understanding these bloodlines is key to understanding how the world operates. He urges readers to resist participation in systems they deem corrupt, highlighting the power of simple refusal, such as saying “no” to masks, vaccines, and propaganda. He also critiques mainstream interpretations of Saturn’s moons and rings, and the proposed origins of Titan’s atmosphere, suggesting they are part of a cover-up.
Here is the summary with the requested markings:
The author, Miles Mathis, claims to have solved the Holy Grail mystery, asserting it refers to royal bloodlines rather than a physical object. He believes this truth has been obscured by cultural narratives and fictional works, including Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code, Raiders of the Lost Ark, and Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Mathis connects this historical misdirection to his genealogy work and research into the Phoenicians. He argues that prominent figures in government, science, art, and Hollywood are closely related and descend from ancient ruling families, tracing their lineage back to William the Conqueror and Charlemagne, and ultimately to Rome and Phoenicia. He suggests that Dan Brown’s work was a deliberate diversion, possibly by someone of Kohen descent, to prevent the public from understanding the importance of these bloodlines. Mathis posits that the Merovingian dynasty, linked to The Matrix, originated from the Julio-Claudian dynasty of Rome, with Troy and Phoenicia as even earlier origins.
The text introduces a speculative theory that humanity may have originated from Saturn or a similar planet with a warmer, more water-rich environment, criticizing mainstream science for its inaccuracies and alleged control by Jews. Mathis analyzes the Phoenician symbol for Saturn, linking it to the Hebrew letter ‘L’ (representing El, also known as Ba’al and Saturn), and its connection to the East India Company and ancient symbols associated with Jesus, implying Phoenician influence within the Vatican by the Renaissance.
Mathis strongly refutes the theories of David Icke, David Talbott, and Immanuel Velikovsky regarding Saturn and cosmic events, labeling them as “controlled opposition” designed to discredit unconventional ideas. He contrasts his own rigorously mathematical and analytical approach with their speculative methods. He believes these figures are used to preemptively dismiss genuine critiques by lumping them with ridiculous theories.
He reiterates that the true “Holy Grail” signifies Phoenician and Phoenician bloodlines, crucial for understanding the world’s power structures. Mathis urges readers to resist societal conformity and participation in what he deems corrupt systems, emphasizing the power of simple refusal. He also criticizes mainstream scientific interpretations of celestial bodies like Saturn and its moon titan, suggesting deliberate obfuscation. The author stresses that true revolution comes from individual refusal to participate in the current system.
Addendum: Mathis distances himself from David Talbott and Immanuel Velikovsky, whom he calls “controlled opposition spooks” for promoting the Saturn Myth. He criticizes their theories as absurd and lacking physical evidence, contrasting them with his own evidence-based approach. He also refutes mainstream scientific criticisms of Velikovsky by presenting his own advanced understanding of charge fields and celestial mechanics. Mathis claims that figures like Talbott and Velikovsky were manufactured to “blackwash” non-mainstream theories and prevent discussion of his own work. He argues that his extensive publications, filled with detailed mathematical critiques of established physicists like Feynman, Einstein, and Landau, demonstrate his superior intellect and render him unassailable. He contrasts his own work with that of David Icke, whom he accuses of promoting a hopeless virtual reality narrative from Saturn and the Moon, hindering real-world resistance. Mathis states that his theories, including controversial views on Phoenicians, Hitler, and others, are part of a larger, interconnected revolution that will eventually be appreciated. He expresses frustration that his critics resort to ad hominem attacks rather than engaging with his mathematical arguments.
Addendum 2: Mathis explicitly distances himself from David Talbott and Immanuel Velikovsky, branding them as “controlled opposition spooks” for their work on “The Saturn Myth” and the “Electrical Universe.” He dismisses their theories as absurd and lacking scientific basis, contrasting them with his own detailed mathematical analysis. Mathis contends that these individuals, along with David Icke, were manufactured to “blackwash” unconventional ideas and prevent the acceptance of his own groundbreaking research. He highlights his extensive publications and mathematical critiques of prominent physicists as proof of his superior intellect and the validity of his work, which he believes cannot be dismissed by broad generalizations. He contrasts his approach with that of David Icke, whom he criticizes for promoting a passive, hopeless narrative of reality being beamed from Saturn and the Moon, thereby hindering meaningful resistance. Mathis reaffirms his commitment to his own revolutionary ideas, which he believes will ultimately be understood, despite initial controversy surrounding topics like Phoenicians and other sensitive subjects. He criticizes his opponents for resorting to misdirection and ad hominem attacks rather than engaging with his mathematical arguments.
Further addendum: Mathis further distances himself from David Talbott and Immanuel Velikovsky, labeling them as “controlled opposition spooks.” He criticizes their theories, particularly “The Saturn Myth,” as absurd and lacking empirical evidence, contrasting them with his own rigorously mathematical approach. Mathis argues that these individuals, alongside David Icke, were deliberately created to discredit non-mainstream theories and preemptively dismiss his own work. He emphasizes his extensive publications and detailed mathematical critiques of leading physicists as evidence of his intellectual superiority and the validity of his findings, which he claims cannot be refuted by superficial dismissals. He contrasts his active, Earth-based approach to resistance with David Icke’s narrative of virtual reality controlled by Saturn and the Moon, which he sees as disempowering. Mathis stands by his controversial ideas, including those concerning Phoenicians and historical figures, asserting they are part of a unified intellectual revolution. He notes that his critics avoid engaging with his mathematical arguments, resorting instead to misdirection and personal attacks.
Addendum (April 17): Mathis acknowledges comparisons to David Icke regarding Saturn theories but asserts significant differences, particularly concerning the Phoenician link and the overall direction of his research. He argues that Icke’s theories are derivative and promote a sense of hopelessness by suggesting reality is beamed from Saturn, thus making resistance impossible. Mathis advocates for tangible, Earth-based resistance through refusal of participation in what he perceives as corrupt systems.
Addendum (April 20): Mathis distances himself from David Talbott and Immanuel Velikovsky, calling them “controlled opposition spooks” for their work on “The Saturn Myth.” He criticizes their theories as absurd and lacking scientific basis, contrasting them with his own rigorously mathematical approach. Mathis contends that these individuals, along with David Icke, were deliberately created to discredit non-mainstream theories and preemptively dismiss his own work. He emphasizes his extensive publications and detailed mathematical critiques of leading physicists as evidence of his intellectual superiority and the validity of his findings, which he claims cannot be refuted by superficial dismissals. He contrasts his active, Earth-based approach to resistance with David Icke’s narrative of virtual reality controlled by Saturn and the Moon, which he sees as disempowering. Mathis stands by his controversial ideas, including those concerning Phoenicians and historical figures, asserting they are part of a unified intellectual revolution. He notes that his critics avoid engaging with his mathematical arguments, resorting instead to misdirection and personal attacks.