Here’s a summary of the provided text, with the requested elements marked:
The provided text, “Laci Peterson: another Men-are-Pigs Project” by Miles Mathis, argues that the Laci Peterson murder case, and similar high-profile events, are fabricated by intelligence agencies for various purposes. Mathis claims that Scott Peterson’s re-sentencing is a sign that this “fake event” is being revisited. He asserts that these staged events, which have been occurring with increasing frequency since the 1960s, are designed to divide sexes, control populations, inflate budgets for CIA, military, and police, and drive consumerism.
Mathis presents several “markers” to support his theory. He suggests that Laci Peterson’s surname, Rocha, has Jewish ties, linking it to the Rockefeller family and prominent Portuguese and Spanish nobility via thepeerage.com. He also claims her family has connections to the Princes von Bayern, Princes von Wittelsbach, Bragancas, d’Orleans, and de Carvalhos. Further, Mathis points to inconsistencies in Laci Peterson’s biography, suggesting she may have worked for the CIA and lived in Niceville, Florida, near Eglin Air Force Base.
Another key figure in Mathis’s argument is Laci Peterson’s stepfather, Ron Grantski (originally Granetzki). Mathis states Grantski was ONI (Naval Intelligence) and a survivor of the USS Liberty attack in 1967, which he labels a false flag operation planned by Israel and the US. He also claims Grantski was Jewish, a Sheib, and a Soenke, linking him to Israel Eldad Scheib and Menachem Begin. Mathis also suggests laci’s mother, Sharon Ruth Rocha, is a mystery with a missing maiden name, and her father may have been Gilberto J. Rocha rather than Dennis Robert Rocha. The text traces the Rocha family lineage back to Antonio Jose Rocha y Lima, the first documented Portuguese settler in California, who owned La Brea Rancho and had ties to Jewish bankers in Holland and South Africa, as well as the Sicilian mafia through Salvatore Lima.
The author extends the alleged conspiracy to Scott Peterson, suggesting his identification is also fabricated. He questions the available records for Scott Peterson, highlighting discrepancies in his listed locations and affiliations with San Quentin. Mathis also scrutinizes Scott Peterson’s appearance in a mugshot, questioning his tan while on death row and comparing it to his appearance in earlier photos, suggesting the tan was acquired on Phoenix golf courses. Scott Peterson’s mother, Jacqueline Helen Latham, is also presented as having Jewish and peerage ties, connected to the Barons of Hendon and Baronets and Barons of Crow Clump, Surrey, and families like the Poe, Hixon, Miller, Rains, and Kennedy. A death in 1945 of Scott Peterson’s grandfather, John Harvey Latham, allegedly at the hands of Robert Sewell who was sent to San Quentin, is also cited as suspicious.
Further “coincidences” include the coroner in Laci Peterson’s case being a Peterson (who the author believes is related despite denials), and the sealing of autopsy reports. The author also links the marriage date of laci and Scott Peterson to the Tate Murders anniversary and notes the dog’s name, McKenzie, connects to peerage scriptwriters and the Phillips family. The circumstances of the initial police search, the immediate offering of a large reward, and the discovery of laci’s body and fetus are all described as highly suspicious and indicative of a staged event. The author dismisses the idea of the fetus being found intact after 3.5 months in the ocean and questions the details of the torso’s discovery.
The capture of Scott Peterson near La Jolla en route to Mexico is also deemed absurd. The author also criticizes the judicial figures involved, including judge Aldo Girolami and prosecuting attorney Rick Distaso, suggesting their backgrounds and career paths are implausible and indicative of intelligence agency involvement. Girolami is linked to Capones and Stewarts, and Distaso’s military background and prosecution of the Douglas Mouser case are highlighted as suspicious. The author also criticizes the legal profession as a whole, suggesting attorneys and judges are aware of these fabricated trials but remain silent for career advancement, and questions the possibility of serving on a jury when one believes the entire system is a fraud.