Here’s a summary of the text with the requested annotations:
The article by Miles Mathis claims that the FBI has been faking terrorism events, a theory he has promoted for years. This claim is bolstered by a ruling from Judge McMahon in New York, who found that the FBI fabricated a 2009 “post 911” terrorism plot targeting New York synagogues. Judge McMahon described the event as a “made for TV movie” and stated that the defendants had not remotely contemplated the actions attributed to them. The FBI informant in this case was Shahed Hussain, also known as Muhammad, who allegedly posed as a wealthy representative of a Pakistani terrorist organization, using BMWs and luxury vehicles provided by the FBI. The author notes hussain’s surname is similar to Hussein (e.g., Saddam Hussein, Barack Hussein Obama) and suggests hussain is Jewish despite claiming to be Pakistani, pointing to his son Nauman’s name as evidence of an Israelite origin.
Shahed Hussain has allegedly been involved in other fake terrorism events. He was a key figure in an FBI sting that led to the conviction of an Albany pizza shop owner and an imam for money laundering and conspiring to aid a terrorist group, with both defendants claiming hussain tricked them during the sting involving a fictitious missile sale. More recently, a botched FBI sting involving hussain in Pittsburgh was featured in the documentary “(T)error.” hussain’s involvement in the Newburgh case was also the subject of an HBO documentary. A third film, “Witness,” documented a 2005 event in Albany involving Shahed Hussain and another individual named Hossain, which the author suggests was a fabricated event involving financing fake arms shipments.
The author expresses surprise that the HBO documentary seemed to corroborate the judge’s criticisms, even though the FBI consulted on it, suggesting a “fake within a fake.” Judge McMahon’s ruling is questioned for its leniency, arguing that if the defendants were entrapped, they should have been released immediately and compensated, rather than receiving a reduced sentence. The author believes the FBI agents and their superiors should face charges for civil rights violations, fraud, and conspiracy. The article posits that these trials are staged to control narratives and that the individuals involved were likely actors, not genuinely entrapped. The author suggests that the narrative of anti-Semitism is maintained by the FBI to justify their actions and maintain funding. The article concludes by suggesting the FBI is used as a diversion, with other agencies like the CIA, DIA, NSA, DHS, ONI, and the Air Force being the “real big dogs,” similar to how the FBI was the “fall guy” for January 6. The author claims that after watergate, the CIA took over the FBI’s significant operations, leaving the FBI as a mere facade.