ADKO

bbb

6 min read

The author, Miles Mathis, criticizes the “Big Beautiful Bill” (bbb) as an “abomination,” arguing that it fails to deliver promised budget cuts, particularly for the military, which receives a trillion-dollar raise. He contends that the bill perpetuates a “war economy” and a “tax-and-spend economy” to satisfy the “bankers’” greed and maintain an “infinite debt ceiling.” The author highlights specific provisions, such as a $175 billion allocation to ICE and border security, which he sees as an expansion of the “police state” and a wasteful duplication of services that the existing military could provide. He questions the rationale behind the massive military spending, especially in the absence of external threats, and contrasts it with China’s spending despite its larger population.

Mathis expresses disgust with the political theater surrounding the bill, citing Jason Smith of Missouri and Mike Johnson’s performances in Congress as examples of insincere rhetoric and sycophancy, particularly towards Netanyahu. He dismisses the notion of tax relief for the middle class, suggesting that a significant defense budget cut would be more beneficial. He also criticizes the bill’s increases for ai development, comparing it to previous failed projects like Reagan’s Star Wars initiative, and argues that the benefits of such spending accrue to “billionaires” while increasing public poverty.

The author then pivots to Donald Trump, acknowledging past support for some of his actions, such as dismantling USAid and pushing back against Pfizer, but expressing skepticism about his potential to win against the “vaccine lobby.” He links Trump’s recent crypto earnings of $1.2 billion to World Liberty Financial, highlighting its significant investor, Chinese billionaire Justin Sun. Mathis suggests a connection to “money laundering” through World Liberty Financial, citing an investment by a firm associated with the Abu Dhabi government and a deal involving MGX, led by Tahnoun bin Zayed Al Nahyan, using USD1 stablecoin to finance a deal with Binance. He notes that Changpeng Zhao, founder of Binance, previously pleaded guilty to money laundering. Mathis also points to a partnership between World Liberty Financial and the Pakistan Crypto Council, questioning the purported high crypto adoption rate in Pakistan as a “conjob.” He mentions Reuters and the New York Times in the context of investigations into these financial dealings. The author explicitly states he is not aligned with Elon Musk, despite Musk’s criticism of the bill, viewing Musk’s potential political ventures as a means to control and divide opposition, advocating instead for a grassroots revolution. He briefly mentions Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the CIA in relation to potential political movements.

Summary with Annotated Entities:

The author, Miles Mathis, criticizes the “Big Beautiful Bill” (bbb) as an “abomination,” arguing that it fails to deliver promised budget cuts, particularly for the military, which receives a trillion-dollar raise. He contends that the bill perpetuates a “war economy” and a “tax-and-spend economy” to satisfy the “bankers’” greed and maintain an “infinite debt ceiling.” The author highlights specific provisions, such as a $175 billion allocation to ICE and border security, which he sees as an expansion of the “police state” and a wasteful duplication of services that the existing military could provide. He questions the rationale behind the massive military spending, especially in the absence of external threats, and contrasts it with China’s spending despite its larger population.

Mathis expresses disgust with the political theater surrounding the bill, citing Jason Smith of Missouri and Mike Johnson’s performances in Congress as examples of insincere rhetoric and sycophancy, particularly towards Netanyahu. He dismisses the notion of tax relief for the middle class, suggesting that a significant defense budget cut would be more beneficial. He also criticizes the bill’s increases for ai development, comparing it to previous failed projects like Reagan’s Star Wars initiative, and argues that the benefits of such spending accrue to “billionaires” while increasing public poverty.

The author then pivots to Donald Trump, acknowledging past support for some of his actions, such as dismantling USAid and pushing back against Pfizer, but expressing skepticism about his potential to win against the “vaccine lobby.” He links Trump’s recent crypto earnings of $1.2 billion to World Liberty Financial, highlighting its significant investor, Chinese billionaire Justin Sun. Mathis suggests a connection to “money laundering” through World Liberty Financial, citing an investment by a firm associated with the Abu Dhabi government and a deal involving MGX, led by Tahnoun bin Zayed Al Nahyan, using USD1 stablecoin to finance a deal with Binance. He notes that Changpeng Zhao, founder of Binance, previously pleaded guilty to money laundering. Mathis also points to a partnership between World Liberty Financial and the Pakistan Crypto Council, questioning the purported high crypto adoption rate in Pakistan as a “conjob.” He mentions Reuters and the New York Times in the context of investigations into these financial dealings. The author explicitly states he is not aligned with Elon Musk, despite Musk’s criticism of the bill, viewing Musk’s potential political ventures as a means to control and divide opposition, advocating instead for a grassroots revolution. He briefly mentions Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and the CIA in relation to potential political movements.

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Backlinks

Graph View