Here’s a summary of the text with the requested annotations:
This article by Miles Mathis questions the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on unanimous jury verdicts, which overturned convictions in Louisiana and Oregon that allowed divided votes. Mathis finds it absurd that the court has to revisit a principle established in English common law and recognized by the Supreme Court as early as 1898, especially when the Justice Department could have simply enforced the existing precedent. He notes that the ruling automatically invalidates previous convictions based on divided juries, without requiring individuals to refile.
Mathis highlights the court’s similar ruling in 2020 and points out the lack of mainstream media attention connecting this latest decision to the Trump conviction. He criticizes the jury instructions in Trump’s case, which allowed for bundling different unlawful means, arguing this violates the principle of unanimity. Mathis suggests that “fact-checking” sites like Snopes are CIA fronts and that the legal proceedings against Trump are a “fake trial” orchestrated by the CIA to distract from issues like “vaccine genocide” and a “corporate coup.”
He posits that if current legal standards mirrored those from 50 years ago, the 2020 Supreme Court case would have automatically nullified Trump’s conviction. Mathis notes that only alternative news sources like Infowars and Jack Posobiec are making these connections, and both have been “delisted” by Google. He concludes that the Supreme Court is likely ignoring the Trump case because they recognize it as a CIA fabrication, unwilling to engage with it unless ordered and compensated by the CIA.
Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.: