ADKO

tian

5 min read

This text argues that the Tiananmen Square Massacre was staged, presenting a series of claims and evidence to cast doubt on the official narrative. The author questions the iconic Tank Man photograph, suggesting the man was not run over and that the tanks were leaving the square. The author also scrutinizes the image’s supposed inconsistencies, like the man’s legs and changes in pavement lines, suggesting digital manipulation. The identity of Tank Man, also known as Wang Weilin, is also questioned, with conflicting reports about his fate. The author further probes the photographer, Stuart Franklin, linking him to Greenpeace and suggesting his admission of staged photos in a Harper’s article is a tactic to mislead. The author also highlights Franklin’s accommodation in a hotel owned by the military and the confiscation of film before the Tank Man incident, implying complicity.

The text then delves into the origins of the protests, attributing them to Hu Yaobang’s death and the subsequent rise of corruption and nepotism. It suggests that the Beijing Workers’ Autonomous Federation (BWAF), which emerged during the protests, was an infiltrated group with unclear origins and a fleeting existence, led by Han Dongfang. Han Dongfang’s past in the Public Security Soldiers Corps (later People’s Armed Police or PAP), which handles “mass incidents,” is presented as suspicious. His rapid rise to prominence as a spokesperson and his seemingly unconcerned behavior are interpreted as evidence of him being an undercover agent. The author also points to Li Lu, another protest leader, and his later involvement with Himalaya Capital Management and The Asian American Foundation, which the author labels a CIA front. Li Lu’s association with Jonathan Greenblatt of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and his “Global Leader for Tomorrow” designation by the World Economic Forum are presented as further evidence of his being a tool of international financiers.

The text also criticizes the visual evidence of the massacre, suggesting photos are poorly staged with unnatural blood effects and pasted elements. The author posits that the massacre was faked to facilitate the transition of China’s economy to a privatized system, driven by international billionaires. This transition, according to the author, was met with resistance due to corruption and the perceived loss of national wealth to international entities. The author asserts that George Soros and the Ministry of State Security (MSS), China’s version of the CIA, were involved in orchestrating the events. The China Fund, established by Soros in China, is alleged to have been an MSS front. The author further claims the CIA was involved in helping dissidents like Li Lu and Chai Ling flee China through Operation Yellowbird. Chai Ling’s pre-massacre statements expressing a desire for bloodshed are highlighted as foreknowledge.

Finally, the text concludes that the Tiananmen Square Massacre was a deliberate act by the Chinese government to appear as the villain, thereby positioning “pro-democratic” foreign interests as saviors and tricking the Chinese people into accepting a system that sabotaged their economic stability, all under the guise of “democracy” and “freedom.” The author sees this as a larger pattern of billionaires using political ideologies as fronts for fascism and tyranny.

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Graph View