ADKO

tate3

2 min read

This article criticizes Tucker Carlson’s interview with Andrew Tate, questioning Tate’s qualifications and fame. The author, Miles Mathis, argues that Tucker Carlson was ordered to promote Andrew Tate, despite Tate being a poor spokesperson for the cause of promoting masculinity and pushing back against the New World Order. Mathis also doubts the authenticity of Tate’s house arrest and imprisonment in Romania, suggesting it’s a fabricated story to gain credibility, likening it to the cases of Assange and Snowden. He finds Tate’s lifestyle and perceived association with Jeff Koons’ art as effeminate and contradictory to his claims of masculinity.

The author points out discrepancies in Tate’s own account of his charges, contrasting it with Forbes’ reporting of rape allegations. Mathis also questions why Tate remained in Romania to face charges if he was innocent and had the means to leave. He further argues that the alleged illegal activities, such as setting up OnlyFans accounts for women and taking a percentage, are not legally actionable unless rape is proven.

The article then shifts to discuss two other cases: Brian Mock’s trial and Taylor Taranto. Mathis deems Mock’s trial a “mock trial,” criticizing the proceedings and the judge’s comments. He also questions the legal reasoning presented by US Attorney Michael Gordon. Regarding Taylor Taranto, Mathis suggests he is a manufactured figure intended to discredit his own past reporting on Ashli Babbitt and the January 6 events. The author concludes by stating that the alternative press, like the mainstream, perpetuates fear and confusion to distract from real issues, such as alleged harm from fake vaccines and financial manipulation.

List of entities:

Graph View