ADKO

tat

4 min read

Here’s a summary of the text with the requested annotations:

The author, Miles Mathis, discusses a recent movie viewing experience, starting with the 1994 film The Favor after finding violent films too disturbing due to his elevated anxiety levels. He recounts how he stumbled upon The Favor while searching for other films starring Blake Lively and describes it as a “chick flick” but recommends it primarily for Harley Jane Kozak, whom he finds exceptionally attractive and a competent comedy actress despite a less than stellar career. He also mentions Brad Pitt and Elizabeth McGovern as nominal lead actors, but considers Kozak the true centerpiece.

Mathis then heavily criticizes Brad Pitt’s performance in The Favor, calling it “intolerable” and “cringeworthy,” particularly a scene where Pitt’s character draws with McGovern’s lipstick. This leads Mathis to question Pitt’s on-screen age and birthdate, proposing that his birthdate may have been moved back five years to make him appear older and more suitable for romantic lead roles. He notes Pitt’s perceived youthful appearance at age 29 in the film, his high-pitched voice (which he believes was lowered through smoking), and his seemingly late career start in Thelma and Louise (1991) despite uncredited early appearances. Mathis also disputes Pitt’s presence in No Way Out (1987) and Another World (1987), citing physical discrepancies and Pitt’s left-handedness versus right-handedness in the latter.

The latter half of the text focuses on Brad Pitt’s tattoos, which Mathis claims are misrepresented by mainstream sources. He analyzes several tattoos, including a potential phoenix, a tattoo resembling stylized Hebrew/Phoenician script interpreted as relating to “the great god El”, an image of an emaciated nude man possibly depicting Otzi the Iceman but interpreted by Mathis as a threat, and Jolie’s supposed doodles on his back. He also discusses a quote attributed to Rumi on Pitt’s arm and a Thai symbol with a quote about life and death. He criticizes the perceived sentimentality and lack of intelligence behind these tattoos, contrasting them with his own view of the body as a sacred vessel. Mathis also mentions a tattoo of a motorcycle, the word “INVICTUS,” and other hieroglyphics or stick figures, including a tornado.

He then compares Pitt’s tattoos unfavorably to those of Justin Bieber, whom he deems the “king of stupid” for his extensive ink, including Christian and illuminati symbolism and a mistranslated Roman numeral.

Finally, Mathis returns to Harley Jane Kozak, detailing her father Joseph Aloysius Kozak’s name and its potential connection to Hitler’s name. He corrects the narrative of her career, stating she worked in soaps and films from a young age and holds an MFA from New York University, rather than waiting tables for ten years.

The text concludes with Mathis discussing a story by Mike Adams at NaturalNews about Bill Clinton being a CIA agent, attributing the information to whistleblower Stewart Webb. Mathis claims Webb’s information originates from his own 2016 paper on Clinton, suggesting Adams and others are prevented from directly referencing his work and instead use intermediaries like Webb and Mike Adams himself, implying they are also part of a “mindstir” or intelligence operation due to their “Presidential names.” He notes that NaturalNews is currently on the “right side of the aisle” but acknowledges this can change.

Here is the list of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc.:

Graph View