This article by Miles Mathis argues that theories about Tartaria and Khazaria are forms of misdirection, primarily promoted by Jews to conceal their true origins and current global power. Mathis claims that the Khazar theory, which suggests Ashkenazi Jews originated from Khazars in Russia, is flawed. Instead, he posits that Phoenicians infiltrated and subverted areas, eventually becoming synonymous with Jews. He asserts that Phoenicians and Jews are the same people, originating from Canaan, Phoenicia, or Jerusalem, and that their alleged distinctness is a fabrication to maintain narratives of victimhood.
Mathis connects this to the claim that modern Jews are not true Israelites, arguing that even if modern Jews have Edomite ancestry (from Esau, brother of Jacob/Israel), this still indicates a shared bloodline with Israelites. He suggests the red hair often seen in modern Jews, and in British Isles populations like Vikings, Scots, and Irish, originates from Edomites. He further critiques the biblical narrative of Jacob stealing Esau’s birthright, implying inherent dishonesty in Jacob’s line and questioning God’s justice.
The author contends that Phoenicia never collapsed but was an extension of Egypt and behind various ancient empires like Persia, Babylon, Mycenae, Crete, Greece, and Macedonia. He asserts that Phoenicians were also behind the Khazars and Tartars, and that these theories are only true in that context. The current promotion of Tartaria theories, particularly online via Youtube and figures like Max Igan, is seen as a recent attempt to misdirect attention, especially after Mathis’s own ideas gained traction.
Mathis addresses other contemporary theories, such as the British Isles being founded by Sephardic Jews or Ashkenazi not being true Jews, viewing them as attempts to divorce modern Jewish identity from their true lineage. He insists his theory that Jews and Phoenicians are the same entity does not misdirect but rather clarifies their historical role and current global dominance as merchants and bankers.
He explains historical conflicts as either manufactured to generate profit or as internal disputes among different Phoenician families vying for control in various regions, citing the Dutch East India Company versus the British East India Company as an example.
Mathis analyzes historical portraits of figures like Genghis Khan, suggesting their changing appearance reflects a deliberate manipulation of identity. He proposes that “Khan” is derived from Komnenes or Cohen, and that Genghis Khan himself was possibly Genghis Komnene or Genghis Cohen, a descendant of the Komnenes from Armenia. He links the name “Khan” to Cohen and suggests “Genghis” is a localization of “George.”
He further traces connections to the Naiman people, proposing they are linked to the biblical tribe of Benjamin (specifically Naaman) rather than being a Mongolian tribe, and suggests this connects to modern surnames like Neiman and businesses like Neiman-Marcus in Dallas, Texas, with Korben Dallas (a character played by Bruce Willis) being a prominent promoter of the Tartaria theory. He links “Jochi,” son of Genghis Khan, to Jacob, and the ruling family Borjigin to Borgia and Bourbons. He also points out Sahin Giray, the last Khan of Crimea, having a potentially Jewish name and studying in Greece and Venice.
Mathis interprets symbols on flags, like the Griffon/Phoenix and Owl, as evidence of Phoenician influence, noting the owl’s presence on Phoenician coins and its symbolism of wisdom and covert operations, also seen in modern organizations like the CIA and NRO. He argues the two-headed eagle, a symbol of empires from Byzantium and Rome to Prussia and Russia, is actually a phoenix, citing its representation in the coat of arms of Byzantine Emperor John VIII Palaiologos and its historical association with Mycenae and the Hittites.
He extends this connection to India, suggesting the two-headed Gandaberunda bird represents the phoenix and links to the Wodeyer dynasty of Mysore, and through them to Woden. He theorizes that Dravidian languages are a phonetic alteration of “Davidian,” indicating Phoenician or Hebrew influence in India, a link he claims is deliberately obscured by scholars.
Mathis asserts that Phoenicians were present in India and China long before mainstream history suggests. He examines the Achaemenid Persian symbol of a phoenix with three balls, linking it to Medici balls and solar disks, and connects the Achaemenids to the Orontid dynasty of Armenia, where Aramaic and late Phoenician were spoken. He argues that the distinction between Phoenician, Hebrew, and Aramaic is manufactured, and that Phoenicians never disappeared but rather transformed.
He further proposes that Armenia’s ancient name, Hayk, connects to the surname Hayek. He emphasizes the role of Hiram I, King of Tyre, in building Solomon’s Temple and David’s Palace, arguing that Hiram and Solomon were co-heads of a vast trading empire, and that both David and Solomon were Phoenicians. He points to the biblical naming of David’s mother, Nitzevet, and Solomon’s mother, Bathsheba, as potentially Phoenician names, despite historical attempts to obscure this. He argues that Gilon, Bathsheba’s father’s home, was in Phoenicia, not Israel.
Mathis concludes that after David’s time, Israelites and Phoenicians became indistinguishable, with Phoenicians hiding within Israelite royal lines and other empires and dynasties, including the Mongols, Vikings, Romans, Byzantines, Medicis, Bourbons, Rothschilds, Rockefellers, and Kennedys. He explains this constant name-changing as a method of “hiding in plain sight,” symbolized by the phoenix.
The addendum discusses Bruce Willis, his alleged Jewish ancestry, and connections to various historical figures and founding families of America. It also analyzes the story of Tamerlane (Timur), suggesting historical accounts of his deformities and appearance are also subject to misdirection.
Summary with Marked Entities:
The article by Miles Mathis argues that theories surrounding Tartaria and Khazaria are deliberate misdirections orchestrated by Jews to obscure their true Phoenician origins and present-day global control. Mathis asserts that the Khazar theory, claiming Ashkenazi Jews originated from Khazars in Russia, is a fabrication. He posits that Phoenicians infiltrated and took over various regions, ultimately becoming synonymous with Jews, both originating from Canaan, Phoenicia, or Jerusalem. This narrative is allegedly used to foster a sense of victimhood and divert attention from their actual historical and current power as global merchants and bankers.
Mathis connects this to the idea that modern Jews are not true Israelites, suggesting that even Edomite ancestry, if present, still implies a shared bloodline. He speculates that red hair, common among modern Jews and in populations like Vikings, Scots, and Irish, stems from Edomites. He criticizes the biblical account of Jacob and Esau, implying inherent dishonesty in Jacob’s lineage and questioning divine justice.
The author contends that Phoenicia was never destroyed but was an extension of Egypt and influenced empires like Persia, Babylon, Mycenae, Greece, and Macedonia. He believes Phoenicians were behind the Khazars and Tartars, making these theories true only in that context. The current promotion of Tartaria theories, particularly online via Youtube and figures like Max Igan, is seen as a recent misdirection tactic. Mathis dismisses other theories about British Isles origins and Ashkenazi identity as attempts to disconnect modern Jews from their heritage. He insists his theory that Jews and Phoenicians are the same clarifies their historical role and current dominance.
Historical conflicts are attributed to manufactured events for profit or internal Phoenician power struggles, exemplified by the Dutch East India Company versus the British East India Company. Mathis analyzes portraits of figures like Genghis Khan, suggesting changes in depiction are intentional. He proposes “Khan” derives from Komnenes or Cohen, and that Genghis Khan may have been Genghis Komnene or Genghis Cohen, linked to Armenia. He connects the Naiman people to the biblical tribe of Benjamin (specifically Naaman) and modern surnames like Neiman, and entities like Neiman-Marcus in Dallas, Texas, noting Korben Dallas’s association with promoting the Tartaria theory. He links Jochi, son of Genghis Khan, to Jacob, and the Borjigin family to Borgia and Bourbons. He also notes potential Jewish connections in names like Sahin Giray of Crimea.
Symbols like the Griffon/Phoenix and Owl on flags are interpreted as Phoenician markers. The owl’s association with Phoenicia, wisdom, and covert operations is highlighted, as is its presence with modern agencies like the CIA and NRO. The two-headed eagle, prevalent in various empires, is reinterpreted as a phoenix, citing its appearance in the coat of arms of Byzantine Emperor John VIII Palaiologos and its link to Mycenae and the Hittites.
The Gandaberunda bird in India is also identified as a phoenix, connecting to the Wodeyer dynasty of Mysore and Woden. Mathis theorizes Dravidian languages are derived from “Davidian,” indicating Phoenician or Hebrew influence in India, which he claims is deliberately obscured. He asserts Phoenicians were in India and China far earlier than conventionally accepted. He links the Achaemenid symbol to the Orontid dynasty of Armenia, arguing that Phoenician, Hebrew, and Aramaic are essentially the same language and that Phoenicians never disappeared.
He highlights Hiram I, King of Tyre, as a key figure in building Solomon’s Temple and David’s Palace, suggesting Hiram and Solomon co-led a vast empire and were Phoenicians. He points to potential Phoenician origins of David’s mother, Nitzevet, and Solomon’s mother, Bathsheba, and argues that Gilon, Bathsheba’s father’s location, was in Phoenicia.
Mathis concludes that after David’s era, Israelites and Phoenicians merged, with Phoenicians assimilating into various empires and dynasties, including the Mongols, Vikings, Romans, Byzantines, Medicis, Bourbons, Rothschilds, Rockefellers, and Kennedys. This constant name-changing is seen as a method of “hiding in plain sight,” symbolized by the phoenix. The addendum touches on Bruce Willis, his alleged ancestry, and the historical narrative of Tamerlane.