This article by Miles Mathis discusses the author’s opposition to mainstream explanations of Solar Cycles and the perceived censorship and suppression of his theories. Mathis highlights search results from Yandex and Google that feature a decade-old discussion thread from cloudynights.com prominently, while his own more recent and apparently viral papers are ranked lower. He criticizes the individuals involved in the cloudynights.com discussion, particularly David Knisely and Glenn LeDrew, for what he considers unscientific ad hominem attacks and dismissals rather than substantive rebuttals. Mathis argues that his theory, which is based on charge and photons, correctly predicts Solar Cycle activity, including planetary alignments, while mainstream science, supposedly influenced by organizations like NASA, Air Force, and The Pentagon, has failed to respond adequately. He suggests that Air Force may have intervened to silence dissent in 2021 and that mainstream scientists are either forced into silence or are protecting their own positions. Mathis further critiques Philalethes for misrepresenting his work and for engaging in “bald lying” in his attempt to discredit Mathis’s solar cycle predictions. He concludes by stating that despite attempts to suppress his work, those in the scientific field will eventually recognize the truth and that his theories represent the honest expansion of science, contrasting it with the current “strangulation and death” of the field, which he likens to Modern Art and a system for “money laundering and treasury dipping.” He also points out discrepancies regarding the supposed affiliations of Knisely and LeDrew with the James Webb Space Telescope.
Here is a list of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc., marked with double square brackets:
The author, Miles Mathis, expresses his opposition to mainstream explanations of Solar Cycles. He notes that his own papers appear in Yandex searches, but a 2014 discussion on cloudynights.com from over a decade ago ranks highly. He criticizes the participants, especially David Knisely and Glenn LeDrew, for their unscientific criticisms and dismissals. Mathis claims his charge and photon-based theory accurately predicts Solar Cycle activity, including planetary alignments, while mainstream science, allegedly influenced by NASA, Air Force, and The Pentagon, has not responded adequately. He suspects Air Force may have silenced reporting on sunspots in 2021. He also criticizes Philalethes for misrepresenting his work and lying. Mathis likens modern science to Modern Art and a tool for financial misconduct. He questions the affiliations of Knisely and LeDrew, stating they do not appear to be connected to the James Webb Space Telescope. He mentions Yandex, Google, Bing, cloudynights.com, James Webb Space Telescope, Solar Wind, Jovians, EM fields, NASA, Air Force, The Pentagon, Solon.info, Geryl, Glomar response, Mordor, NOAA, Fourmilab, CIA, George Mason University, immixgroup, McLean, VA, Mad Magazine, The National Enquirer, SpaceWeather forum, and Philalethes.