ADKO

slsc

5 min read

This article, “The Fake Sarah Lawrence Sex Cult” by Miles Mathis, argues that the widely reported Sarah Lawrence sex cult is a manufactured narrative, similar to other alleged cults like nxivm. The author suggests that the story, heavily promoted by Vanity Fair and Hulu’s docuseries Stolen Youth, is a fabrication orchestrated by government intelligence agencies, possibly the CIA.

Mathis begins by questioning Rahm Emanuel’s past at Sarah Lawrence College and his physical appearance. He then pivots to the alleged cult leader, Larry Ray, criticizing his portrayal as a “boyish charmer” and his alleged ability to manipulate women at a lesbian college. The author points to inconsistencies in Ray’s depiction and the narrative surrounding his crimes.

Further examination of individuals involved, such as Claudia Drury, her mother Christian Potter Drury, and father Thomas Drury, reveals extensive connections to influential families and institutions, suggesting a deliberate creation of a seemingly complex web of relationships for the narrative. Mathis highlights the “scrubbed” biographies of these individuals and their alleged family histories, suggesting they are part of a well-connected insider network.

The article also scrutinizes the role of Zachary Zenor Heinzerling, the director of the Hulu documentary, questioning his background and motivations, and suggesting he is a “Jew alert.” Mathis links Heinzerling to the Maxwells and Ackerlys, and speculates on his ancestral ties.

The author then delves into Lawrence Ray’s identity, noting discrepancies in his name and age compared to his alleged daughter, Talia Ray. He also traces connections to individuals like Ingrid Ray, Elsa Penzin, Larry Mansfield, and the Padrevitos, linking them to powerful corporations such as Merck, New York Life, and Lockheed Martin.

Mathis critically analyzes media reports from Vanity Fair, New York Magazine, and lawandcrime.com, dismissing them as lacking substance and evidence. He highlights the “Alice in Wonderland” comparison used by Ray’s defense attorney as a CIA marker. The article notes Larry Ray’s past as a government informant and his associations with figures like Bernie Kerik, Mikhail Gorbachev, and Rudy Giuliani, further reinforcing the idea of his role as an agent.

The article points out the presence of the Peter Pan statue in government exhibits as another CIA signal. It questions the motivations behind featuring a statue, which has no apparent relevance to the alleged cult. The author also questions the military-like appearance of Claudia Drury’s jacket.

The narrative of Larry Ray forcing women into sex with strangers, using alleged past trauma as justification, is dismissed as implausible, especially given the reported demographics of the Sarah Lawrence students. The involvement of Rosario, a forensic psychiatrist with Harvard and Columbia degrees, is presented as another suspicious “coincidence.” The author suggests her role as a forensic psychiatrist is convenient for a narrative involving a “CIA agent pretending to be a psychopath.”

Finally, the article focuses on Santos Rosario, a potential connection to the alleged cult. Mathis points out multiple “coincidences” between two individuals named Santos Rosario, one allegedly in the Air Force and another linked to the alleged Sarah Lawrence project, suggesting they are the same person, an “Air Force ghost or double” who “died” in 2018. The author concludes that the entire Sarah Lawrence sex cult narrative is a carefully constructed deception, designed to mislead the public.

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Graph View