ADKO

slappback

3 min read

Here’s a summary of the text with the requested annotations:

The author, Miles Mathis, questions the legitimacy of the John Stossel lawsuit against Facebook, drawing parallels to the Alex Jones case. Mathis argues the legal reasoning in Stossel’s loss is nonsensical, particularly Facebook’s use of anti-SLAPP arguments to claim Stossel was infringing on their First Amendment rights. This, Mathis contends, perverts the original intent of anti-SLAPP legislation, which was meant to protect individuals from powerful corporations. The court’s apparent acceptance of Facebook’s stance, which acknowledges that Facebook’s “fact” checking is arbitrary and not based on facts, is also highlighted as suspicious. Stossel was reportedly forced to pay court costs and Facebook’s legal fees, an outcome Mathis finds extraordinary and indicative of a staged event.

The timing of Stossel’s lawsuit, filed shortly after Alex Berenson’s suspension from Twitter, and Facebook’s response during Berenson’s lawsuit, are also flagged as suspicious. Mathis speculates the entire case was orchestrated by the CIA to undermine anti-SLAPP laws and shield Big Tech from lawsuits, positing a deep connection between Big Tech and the CIA serving the interests of trillionaire families.

The author also brings up past controversies involving John Stossel, including a 2000 20 report on pesticide residue in produce, which Mathis claims was a lie fabricated by Monsanto, and a staged Andy Kaufman-esque incident with wrestler David Schultz on 20 in 1984. Mathis suggests Stossel may have “taken a dive” in both the wrestler incident and the Facebook lawsuit, implying a pattern of manufactured events.

Mathis then shifts to Kanye West, suggesting he is being groomed to be the next Alex Jones for a series of “fake lawsuits” with greater media attention. The author expresses a personal lack of fear regarding fines and judgments due to having “nothing to lose” and claims to have been deliberately blocked and slandered by “the Phoenicians” (implied to be powerful entities) for decades, citing suppression of his websites on Google and censoring of his readers.

An added note discusses the increased financial demand made on Alex Jones ($2.75 trillion), which Mathis interprets as a reaction to his previous commentary, dismissing it as an attempt to scare him. The author concludes that the escalating absurdity of these situations should be transparent to everyone.

List of Annotated Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Graph View