Here’s a summary of the text with the requested annotations:

The author Miles Mathis discusses the concept of the Successor Ideology, a term coined by Wesley Yang to encompass recent “radical” movements such as BLM, critical race theory, cultural Marxism, and transgender promotion. Mathis argues that these movements, rather than being organic, have been manufactured by Intelligence agencies to create division, distract from the wealthy elite, and dismantle old-style liberalism. He points to a discussion at the Manhattan Institute involving Yang, Reihan Salam, Coleman Hughes, and Ross Douthat as an example of deliberate misdirection, as they avoid discussing the source of these movements. Mathis also criticizes Matt Taibbi for similar misdirection in a piece republished by Zerohedge, suggesting Taibbi misses that the movements were created by Intelligence to sow discord.

Mathis asserts that conservatives are partially correct in identifying the divisive nature of these movements but are paid to overlook the CIA connection. He states that conservatives, particularly those associated with the Republican Party, are unable to target the wealthy elite because they are part of it, using Tucker Carlson and his interviews with individuals from the Hoover Institution as an example. The author suggests that the Manhattan Institute was founded by William Casey, former director of the CIA under Reagan, and Antony Fisher, a Trinity College and RAF figure linked to F. A. Hayak, the FEE (Foundation for Economic Education), and the IEA (Institute of Economic Affairs). Fisher’s granddaughter, a former Facebook VP now at Netflix, is married to Steve Hilton, a former director of strategy for David Cameron and FoxNews host, indicating influence across various sectors.

Mathis further claims that Wesley Yang’s early work on the Virginia Tech mass shooting and Seung-Hui Cho did not identify it as an Intelligence-manufactured event or Cho as a crisis actor, which he believes is why the Manhattan Institute and Matt Taibbi now promote him. The author concludes that viewing these events from a higher perspective, beyond the “media level,” is necessary to understand that the entire script is fabricated by Intelligence to promote short-term division and ultimately push the country towards a hard-right agenda, reminiscent of the Reagan years. This is intended to create a backlash against a “fake left” and revitalize the Republican Party, offering a seemingly more palatable tyranny from the right as a solution to anxieties about trannies, Marxists, radical gays, feminists, and rioting blacks. Mathis believes that middle America is being manipulated by Intelligence and the trillionaires behind it, diverting attention from the economic pillaging of the treasury and the deferral of national debt repayment.

Annotated List: