This article, “More on the Mid-term Election” by Miles Mathis, published on November 14, 2022, argues that the recent mid-term elections were not a genuine democratic process but a staged event orchestrated by hidden powers. Mathis dismisses various explanations offered by public figures and instead posits that the election’s outcome was predetermined by a shadowy group he refers to as the “Phoenician Navy,” the “Lords of the Isles,” the “Octopus,” or the “trillionaires running the world,” which he also dubs the “Deep State” (though he disputes the accuracy of this term).

The author claims these hidden orchestrators have the technology to manipulate elections instantaneously and that the week-long vote counting was intentional to create suspicion and ensure people knew the election was stolen. This, he suggests, was to further “ground down” the public, making them more receptive to being “saved” by these powers and thus less likely to consider revolution. He believes this is part of a prolonged plan to keep the public in a state of fear and dependency, even leading them to accept experimental vaccines. Mathis asserts that these powers derive sadistic pleasure from the fear and confusion they create, citing figures like Klaus Schwab, Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Gavin Newsom, and Justin Trudeau as examples.

The article then shifts focus to the alleged implosion of Sam Bankman-Fried’s cryptocurrency exchange FTX and his associated trading firm Alameda. Mathis views Bankman-Fried as a manufactured figure, likening him to Elon Musk, and suggests the entire narrative surrounding his rise and fall is a fabricated story designed to serve a hidden agenda. He questions the math presented by Wikipedia regarding Bankman-Fried’s wealth and points to his association with the Centre for Effective Altruism (CEA) at Oxford and Berkeley, suggesting it’s a front, possibly a “Centre for Ineffective Altruism,” with ties to the CIA.

Mathis alleges that Bankman-Fried funneled millions to the Democratic National Committee through FTX and Alameda as a form of money laundering, and that the implosion of FTX was potentially timed to damage the Democratic Party further. He draws parallels between FTX and the historical Credit Mobilier Scandal and highlights Jim Cramer’s comments on NBC questioning Bankman-Fried’s legitimacy. The author also scrutinizes Bankman-Fried’s background, his parents’ affiliations with Stanford Law School, and his alleged living situation in the Bahamas, suggesting he is part of a deliberate scheme.

The article further links the CEA to the Global Priorities Institute at Oxford, and to individuals like Isaiah Berlin, John Broome, Amartya Sen, and Emma Rothschild, suggesting a network of powerful figures connected to institutions like MIT, cornell, Berkeley, and Harvard. A. C. Grayling is also mentioned, connecting to the World Economic Forum. Baroness Warnock is cited for her involvement with the Global Priorities Institute and controversial work on human embryos. The author notes Jeff Bezos’s similar promise to give away his fortune, implying a pattern. He also makes a speculative comment about Joe Biden’s appearance.

The article concludes with a further updated comment on Wikipedia’s actions regarding the link between CEA and the Global Priorities Institute, suggesting a cover-up involving Elon Musk as a funder. It reiterates the suspicion that Musk is part of a manufactured narrative, pointing to his actions on Twitter regarding Alex Jones and Sandy Hook. The author expresses a belief that the current crisis is not leading to a complete societal collapse but is instead a deliberate manipulation by these hidden powers, and that the solutions are simple but inaccessible due to the current leadership. He questions whether the future will be dictated by more “Phoenicians” or by “Revolutionaries,” but leans towards the former due to a perceived lack of popular will for revolution. He finds a glimmer of hope in the intellectual anger expressed in online comments sections, particularly on YouTube, and mentions Michael Shermer being heavily criticized.

Key Entities and Concepts: