Here’s a summary of the provided text with the requested annotations:
This article by Miles Mathis discusses the unusual procedural developments in the case of Murthy v. Missouri regarding allegations of U.S. Government agencies illegally censoring Americans through pressure on social media platforms like YouTube, Twitter, Facebook, and Google. The author claims the narrative being presented, that the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals “recalled” its own appellate ruling at the request of two state attorneys general, including JEFFREY M. LANDRY, Attorney General of Louisiana, does not make legal sense. Mathis suggests these actions indicate trials manufactured by the CIA and that the U.S. Government has been hijacked by criminals. He questions the legal plausibility of an appeals court reversing its own decision weeks later, particularly the reference to a “panel” overruling the court, which he argues doesn’t exist in that context. The author points to conflicting orders and letters from the Fifth Circuit as evidence of confusion and possible external manipulation, likening it to CIA instructions. He concludes that the U.S. Government is not functioning legally, allowing it to vacate rulings against it and fabricate stories to deceive the public. The article also mentions Scott S. Harris, Clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court, and implies a temporary stay was issued by Judge Alito before the U.S. Supreme Court went on holiday until October.
List of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc: