ADKO

niall

6 min read

This article criticizes Douglas Murray and Niall Ferguson, arguing they are not genuine historians but rather highly promoted figures who parrot mainstream narratives and engage in propaganda. The author, Miles Mathis, contrasts their careers with his own prolific output of original research.

Mathis begins by addressing a comment made by Douglas Murray on Joe Rogan’s podcast, which Mathis claims to never watch. He learned of the controversy through The Gateway Pundit. Mathis dismisses Murray’s criticism of Darryl Cooper and Ian Carroll appearing on Rogan’s show, suggesting Cooper and Carroll might be covert operations designed to distract from Mathis’s own work. He questions their legitimacy due to their lack of transparency and military backgrounds.

Mathis then scrutinizes Douglas Murray’s credentials, calling his biography “slender and unimpressive.” He points out Murray’s early publications, his degree in English from Oxford, and his gay identity as conservative, suggesting these are often used to present him as an unlikely figure, but ultimately seeing him as a “double-agent.” Mathis criticizes Murray’s books, including those on Oscar Wilde’s companion Alfred Douglas, Neoconservatism, the Savile inquiry, and “The Strange Death of Europe,” claiming they are either poorly researched, promote misdirection, or avoid the true causes of issues like immigration, instead blaming “the left” while hiding the real “puppetmasters” like “trillionaire bankers and aristocrats.” He also criticizes Murray’s perceived inability to present a straightforward argument, calling him a “slippery eel.” Mathis suggests Murray’s lineage is connected to peerage Murrays, Stanleys, and Douglases.

The author then turns his attention to Niall Ferguson, labeling him a “much bigger spook than Douglas Murray” and likely related. Ferguson’s background, including his Oxford education, rapid academic advancement, and roles at Cambridge, New York University, Harvard, and London School of Economics, are presented as highly suspicious. Mathis questions the feasibility of Ferguson’s academic timeline and his simultaneous involvement with companies like Boxmind and Chimerica Media Ltd., as well as his role as an investment management consultant for GLG Partners, run by Noam Gottesman. Mathis also criticizes Ferguson’s early writing for The Daily Telegraph and The Daily Mail at a young age, attributing his access to his privileged family background (Hamilton, Douglas, Campbell).

Mathis strongly condemns Ferguson’s books, particularly “Doom: The Politics of Catastrophe,” calling it “Pfizer propaganda” and questioning its narrative on pandemics, suggesting they were planned. He also dismisses Ferguson’s book “The House of Rothschild: The World’s Banker” as “official hagiography” based on access to private archives and praised by Jewish reviewers. He criticizes Ferguson’s self-proclaimed “classical liberal” stance, highlighting his membership in powerful organizations like the Bilderbergers, CFR, London School of Economics, Harvard, and Hoover Institution. Mathis also attacks Ferguson’s biography of Henry Kissinger, “Kissinger: The Idealist,” as another “sickening hagiography.”

Furthermore, Mathis debunks Ferguson’s concept of “Counterfactual History,” calling it a “MindScrew” and “purposely wrong” fiction designed to control readers. He argues that Ferguson’s book “The Square and the Tower” attempts to debunk his own work by rehashing mainstream lies about topics like 11, the Cambridge Five, and the Illuminati without directly addressing Mathis’s research. Mathis criticizes Ferguson’s inability to connect with his audience and his perceived reliance on AI-generated reviews for his book “The Ascent of Money,” which he describes as a “hagiographer of hedge funds” and a sycophantic portrayal of neoliberal capitalism.

Mathis concludes by urging readers to avoid bestseller lists and mainstream media recommendations, instead seeking out “real books” from used bookstores and libraries. He believes his own work is genuine history, while Ferguson is a “pretender” whose influence will fade, unlike Mathis’s growing reach despite censorship.

Here is a summary of the text with the requested markings:

The article criticizes Douglas Murray and Niall Ferguson, arguing they are highly promoted figures disseminating propaganda rather than genuine historians. Author Miles Mathis dismisses Murray’s criticisms on Joe Rogan’s show and suggests figures like Darryl Cooper and Ian Carroll are distractions. Mathis scrutinizes Murray’s biography and books, deeming them lacking in original research and often misdirecting, particularly regarding immigration, and links him to peerage families like the Stanleys and Douglases.

The author then attacks Niall Ferguson, portraying him as a more significant operative with a suspiciously rapid academic rise from Oxford, and holding influential positions at Cambridge, New York University, Harvard, and London School of Economics. Ferguson’s early journalistic career for The Daily Telegraph and The Daily Mail, along with his involvement in companies like Boxmind and Chimerica Media Ltd., and financial consulting for GLG Partners under Noam Gottesman, are highlighted as red flags. Mathis strongly condemns Ferguson’s books, including “Doom: The Politics of Catastrophe,” calling it “Pfizer propaganda,” and “The House of Rothschild: The World’s Banker” as “official hagiography.” He also criticizes his biography of Henry Kissinger as a “sickening hagiography.”

Mathis dismisses Ferguson’s “Counterfactual History” as a deliberate falsehood designed to control readers, and his book “The Square and the Tower” as an attempt to debunk his own work by rehashing mainstream narratives. He also criticizes “The Ascent of Money” as a sycophantic portrayal of capitalism, possibly supported by AI-generated reviews. Mathis advocates for seeking genuine books from used bookstores and libraries, believing his own work represents “real history” while Ferguson is a mere “pretender.”

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Graph View