The provided text argues that the murder of Kitty Genovese in New York City on March 13, 1964, as reported by the New York Times, was faked. The author, Miles Mathis, claims the event, along with the resulting “Genovese Syndrome” (a psychological concept of bystander apathy), was fabricated for various reasons, including profit and control.
Mathis presents several points to support his claim:
- Photographic Evidence: He asserts that photographic evidence, such as a picture of Genovese as a bartender, is faked, with her head superimposed onto another body. He also questions a later photo of Genovese used by New York outlets upon the death of Winston Moseley.
- Conflicting Reports and Admissions: Mathis highlights that even Wikipedia and the New York Times itself have admitted that the original reporting of the event was exaggerated and lacked evidence of 38 witnesses. He argues that if the reporting was faked, the event itself could have been faked as well.
- Jewish Connections: A recurring theme is the alleged Jewish or crypto-Jewish heritage of individuals involved, including Kitty Genovese, her alleged murderer Winston Moseley, New York Times editor Abraham Rosenthal (born Shiapiatsky), reporter Martin Gansberg, and others. Mathis suggests these connections point to a manufactured event within a specific group.
- The “Men-are-Pigs Project”: The author proposes that the fabricated event serves a larger agenda, the “Men-are-Pigs Project,” orchestrated by “Phoenicians” to generate fear of men among women for profit and control, benefiting industries like therapy, drugs, and beauty products.
- Genovese Family and Connections: Mathis speculates that Kitty Genovese was part of the Genovese crime family and possibly related to Italian nobility, citing connections to the Savoy dynasty and linking this to her perceived “society girl” appearance rather than a bartender. He also notes potential connections to the Giordano family, including Ralph Giordano and Dr. James Giordano, and links this name to Gordon and the Stuarts.
- Alleged Murderer Winston Moseley: Mathis questions Moseley’s identity and background, suggesting he was not half-black as reported but possibly an actor or someone of a different ethnicity, possibly an intelligence operative due to his high IQ. He points out inconsistencies in Moseley’s photos and height, as well as suspicious details about his arrest and confessions, suggesting he was a pawn in a staged event. Mathis also links Winston Moseley to the peerage through the Noel family, demonstrating a pattern of interconnectedness.
- Legal and Procedural Inconsistencies: The author scrutinizes the legal proceedings against Moseley, including the handling of his insanity plea and sentencing, suggesting these were fabricated to avoid a real execution and manipulate the narrative.
- Numerology and Symbols: Mathis points to alleged numerological clues, such as March 18 (3/18) being Moseley’s arrest and escape date, and September 11 (9/11) for the Attica Prison riots. He also interprets the name Patmos in relation to a hostage situation as a deliberate “blackwashing” of Christianity.
- Other Faked Events: Mathis draws parallels to other events he claims were faked, such as the Pentagon Papers, Watergate, the Manson murders, and the Sandy Hook shooting.
- Media Perpetuation: He criticizes authors like Kevin Cook and publications like NPR for continuing to promote the mainstream narrative despite evidence to the contrary. He also notes Harlan Ellison’s involvement in promoting the story through The Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction, highlighting his alleged Jewish heritage and connection to Abraham Rosenthal.
In essence, Mathis argues that the entire Kitty Genovese murder narrative is a meticulously crafted fabrication designed to manipulate public perception and serve a hidden agenda.