Here’s a summary of the text with the requested annotations:
The author, Miles Mathis, argues that the lawsuit and default judgment against Alex Jones regarding the Sandy Hook victims’ parents is a “fake trial,” not a “show trial.” He believes this is a CIA operation designed to silence dissent, comparing it to a similar “phony CIA trial” against Jim Fetzer. Mathis claims to have learned of the Alex Jones case through Infowars and that the facilitators are tracking him online.
Mathis asserts the trial is fake because the first website he found, FirstAmendmentWatch.org, mispelled “judgment” as “judgement,” which he interprets as a sign of Langley (referring to the CIA) involvement. He also critiques the website’s purported affiliation with the Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute at New York University, questioning how journalism and law PhDs could make such a spelling error.
He further disputes the justification for the default judgment, stating that in defamation suits, discovery is not typically requested from the defendant, and the plaintiff should have gathered evidence from Alex Jones’s online posts or used the Wayback Machine. Mathis argues that it’s the plaintiff’s responsibility to present evidence of libel, and the defendant’s role is to argue for free speech protections. He also points out the alleged sanction of Alex Jones paying $122,000 in legal fees upfront as legally impossible, as fees are awarded after a judgment, again attributing such absurdity to the CIA.
Mathis dismisses Alex Jones’s supposed admission of error regarding Sandy Hook as part of the deception, suggesting Jones is an agent of “opposition control.” He contends that the mainstream media and CIA often lie and that the website’s claim that not believing their lies constitutes libel is absurd, providing hypothetical examples involving NASA, SpaceX, Joe Biden, and Keanu Reeves.
The author concludes by stating that while he cannot sue the CIA for their alleged civil rights violations, he can tell the truth, which he believes is their weakness. He then shifts to discuss a recent news story about a man allegedly raping a woman on a Philly train and being filmed, which he also labels as fake due to the date of publication (“10/18, aces and eights”). He mentions the suspect’s name, Fiston Ngoy, and notes the lack of records for him on Intelius and Instantcheckmate despite supposed government records. Mathis suggests Tucker Carlson reporting on this story indicates his writers are paying attention to his own work, as Carlson compared it to the Kitty Genovese story, which he implies is relevant to his previous paper.