Here’s a summary of the text with the requested annotations:

This article by Miles Mathis, published on July 21, 2024, argues that mainstream and alternative media outlets are deliberately misrepresenting Solar Cycles to deceive the public. Mathis claims Zerohedge is prematurely announcing the detection of Solar Cycle 26, which is not expected until 2030 at the earliest. He asserts this is a tactic to declare that the current Cycle 25 has already reached its maximum, despite evidence pointing to a two-peak cycle and a recent spike in April 2024.

Mathis alleges that data, particularly sunspot numbers, has been manipulated since around 2021 by entities like the Air Force, NASA, and NOAA, and even Google, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo, and Bing have been instructed to censor his work. He contrasts this with his own accurate predictions, which he attributes to fitting solar peaks to planetary alignments, including those involving Jupiter and Uranus.

The author criticizes the mainstream scientific community for ignoring his findings and actively suppressing his papers, which he claims are outranking theirs. He argues that their reliance on outdated models and a “gravity-only model” has led them to miss the true mechanism of solar cycles, which he believes are driven by the Sun acting as a synapse in a larger electrical structure, influenced by Galactic Core charge streams and planetary feedback loops.

Mathis also dismisses predictions of a “Grand Solar Minimum” or a “Little Ice Age” in 2030 or 2040, citing outdated studies, including one from 2015 by the deceased Nils-Axel Morner, and noting that Scientific Research still hosts this paper. He points out that researchers like Rachel Howe, who study data from GONG, MDI, and HMI on SOHO and SDO, are studying a “GONG show” and that their methods are flawed because the sun is not the sole driver of its cycles.

He contends that the mainstream scientific establishment, driven by fear, intimidation, and corruption, particularly evident during the Covid pandemic and Pfizer vaccine roll-out, is fundamentally dishonest and has lost its way. Mathis believes that the attempts to bury his work will ultimately backfire, leading to the self-destruction of the current scientific paradigm. He lists numerous other scientific areas he claims to have revolutionized, including unification, nuclear architecture, the Lagrangian, molecular bonding, Bode’s Law, the fine structure constant, superposition, entanglement, the two-slit experiment, the rainbow, lift, pressure flow, and core theory.