ADKO

fusion2

4 min read

The author criticizes the ITER fusion reactor project in France, calling it a “5 billion and expected to be operational in 2020, is now projected to cost $28 billion and not be operational until 2039, making it 19 years overdue and significantly over budget. The author argues that such projects are designed to steal taxpayer money, with politicians complicit in the scams. The history of fusion projects dates back to the 1950s as a means to continue draining treasuries after WWII projects.

The article highlights several points of contention:

  • Over-budgeting and Delays: The author asserts that these projects are intentionally designed to go over budget and face lengthy delays, suggesting this is a mechanism for continued financial drain.
  • Numerology and Symbols: The author points to the number “19” (massive coils) and the acronym “ITER” (which can be interpreted as the Latin word for “the way”) as hidden signals or “numerology” intended for those “outside the program” to recognize the project as a “fake.” The author also links this to “Phoenicians” and their pursuit of “obscene wealth.”
  • Clean Energy Claims: The author questions the claim of “clean energy” production, noting the use of radioactive deuterium and tritium, which require extensive shielding, and comparing it unfavorably to solar fusion.
  • Neutron Energy and Shielding: The article details the high speed and energy of neutrons produced in deuterium-tritium fusion, emphasizing the need for special shielding and questioning how such temperatures (20 times hotter than the Sun’s core) can be contained.
  • Containment Mechanisms: The author expresses skepticism about using lasers or magnetic fields to contain plasma at extreme temperatures, arguing that a perfect sphere is impossible and that rising pressure would be uncontainable. The author also disputes the claimed pressure in the Sun’s core.
  • Tokamak Design and Materials: The article questions the materials used for shielding and containment in tokamaks, suggesting that no known metal can withstand 300 million degrees Celsius.
  • Energy Waste: The author criticizes the plan to simply vent the heat generated by the reactor instead of converting it into usable electricity, labeling it as further evidence of fraud and a contradiction to the idea of an energy crisis.
  • Visual Evidence: The author finds the lack of actual images of the completed ITER reactor in credible sources like Wiki suspicious, suggesting that the provided images are old models or set designs.
  • Physics Discrepancies: The author critiques an article by Roger Jones, an LHC physicist at Cern, regarding the Standard Model of Physics. The author dismisses Jones’s arguments about deviations in particle decay and the Higgs boson, asserting that quarks have never been detected and that Jones is being paid to divert attention from his own work. The author claims to have solved problems related to the muon g-2 experiment and the proton radius puzzle.
  • Perpetual Motion Claims: The author notes a comparison of the ITER project to a perpetual motion machine due to its complex energy requirements for cooling and containment, calling it “viciously circular and laughingly contradictory.”

Ultimately, the author concludes that ITER is a large-scale scam designed for treasury theft, supported by a media landscape that is either complicit or uninformed, and that the true solution for energy lies in Tesla’s theories on tapping the Earth’s charge field.

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Graph View