ADKO

eston

4 min read

The provided text, “The MS Estonia Sinking was Planned” by Miles Mathis, argues that the sinking of the MS Estonia on March 12, 2021 was not an accident but a deliberate act by the ship’s owners to collect insurance money. The author claims the deaths were faked, drawing parallels to his previous analyses of the Titanic, Lusitania, and Hindenburg disasters.

Mathis points to several clues supporting his theory, including the immediate concealment of the MS Estonia wreckage by the governments of Sweden, Finland, and Estonia, which is seen as evidence of a cover-up. The Estonia Agreement 1995, a treaty involving Sweden, Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Poland, Denmark, Russia, and the United Kingdom, is criticized for prohibiting citizens from approaching the wreck, suggesting a desire to hide something. Mathis likens this to the “sanctity of the dead” arguments used after 11.

Further evidence cited includes German divers discovering a large, unexplained hole in the hull in 2020, a finding sold to a Swedish company that produced a documentary. The company was prosecuted but acquitted. The author also notes that thousands of tons of pebbles were dropped on the wreck, and governments are now planning to encase it in concrete to prevent further investigation.

Mathis disputes the official explanation for the sinking, questioning the impossibility of 757 unaccounted bodies and 77% of passengers never being found, given the favorable weather conditions in the Baltic Sea at the time. He highlights the presence of ten lifeboats and the fact that everyone aboard had life jackets, along with the proximity to other ships and land. He dismisses the official account of communication failures and the ship sinking due to a torn-off visor, arguing that the ship’s design, particularly the bow doors and their seals, would have prevented such a rapid sinking. He also questions the reliability of the emergency communication systems and the time it took for rescue helicopters to arrive.

The author suggests that the MS Estonia itself may not have sunk, but was instead a different ship, possibly the MS Sally Albatross, which had been severely damaged in a prior incident and owned by Silja. Mathis speculates that the MS Sally Albatross was rebuilt, repainted, and deliberately sunk as the MS Estonia to collect insurance money, while the actual MS Estonia was repainted and continued service. He points to the MS Sally Albatross being renamed multiple times since 1995 as a way to hide its true identity.

Mathis also critiques the narrative surrounding the discovery of a hole in the hull, suggesting it was from the MS Sally Albatross’s earlier grounding, not an explosion as proposed by some theories like that of Jutte Rabe and the New Statesman. He views these alternative theories as misdirection.

The author concludes by emphasizing the unreliability of official accounts and government involvement, suggesting that the consistent patterns of deception across various incidents, including the MV Dona Paz sinking, point to a deliberate manipulation of events. He stresses the importance of critical thinking and recognizing “snowjobs” and nonsensical statements in official reports.

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Graph View