ADKO

curio

3 min read

This article, “Bad Conspiracy Theorists” by Miles Mathis, argues that reading is a superior method for discerning truth compared to watching videos, which are more easily manipulated. Mathis criticizes the decline of literacy and the reliance on passive video consumption. He suggests that real authors and thinkers often operate in the “margins,” using attractive fronts to hide their true identities and intentions, citing examples like Bill Gates, George Soros, Anthony Fauci, and Klaus Schwab.

Mathis then discusses a recent article reprinted on Infowars by Alex Jones, featuring content from Mises.org and Murray Rothbard. He critiques the writing style of the Rothbard article, suggesting it’s a sign of deception. Mathis believes this republication, specifically mentioning Douglas Reed and his connection to Hitler and Germany, is a deliberate attempt to discredit his own research by associating him with a “bad” conspiracy theorist. He argues that while Rothbard appears to defend conspiracy theorists, he actually aims to label certain ones as “bad,” using Reed as an example. Mathis asserts that he, unlike a “bad” theorist, provides extensive evidence for his conclusions. He also notes that Reed, a formerly prominent author, was “censored,” and his book “The Controversy of Zion” was published late and by a small press, suggesting a deliberate effort to suppress his work and, by association, Mathis’s.

The author extends his critique to Pfizer and its vaccine program, calling it a “Phoenician win” based on corruption and murder. He posits that Nature dispenses justice and that individuals like Albert Bourla and Anthony Fauci will face consequences for their actions, implying reincarnation. Mathis describes himself as a unique being, detached from conventional life and deeply committed to fighting lies and injustice.

Finally, Mathis discusses the movie Idiocracy, arguing it’s a misdirection tactic to distract from the true dangers posed by the “Phoenicians,” whom he claims are actively suppressing intelligence and progress, particularly by targeting talented white males. He believes this is a desperate attempt by the “Phoenicians” to maintain their power and control, leading to their own eventual downfall as they wage war against Nature and themselves. He concludes that their “New World Order” and “Great Reset” are not plans for renewal but acts of revenge and self-destruction, born from their inherent misery and inability to create genuine progress.

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Graph View