ADKO

cosby2

3 min read

Here’s a summary of the text with the requested annotations:

The author, Miles Mathis, argues that the Bill Cosby story, including accusations, trials, and subsequent reports, is entirely fictional and lacks credibility. Mathis cites Cosby’s consistent smiles during legal proceedings as a sign of fakery, comparing it to Sandy Hook actors. He then scrutinizes Cosby’s prime accuser, questioning her appearance, demeanor, and gender presentation to suggest she is a “giant lesbian athlete” unlikely to be a target for date rape by someone like Cosby. Mathis also dismisses Harvey Weinstein’s accusations for similar reasons, suggesting the stories are fabricated for the amusement of their creators.

Further evidence of fakery, according to Mathis, includes Cosby’s alleged admission in a deposition to giving women quaaludes, which Mathis deems illogical for someone pleading not guilty. He questions why Cosby was on the stand at all, given his right to remain silent and the prosecution’s burden of proof. Mathis criticizes the explanation for the accuser’s changing story, which was attributed to psychological effects of rape, calling it a convenient way to avoid inconsistencies. He also finds the lead juror from the 2018 trial, Harrison Snyder, to be a suspicious figure due to his apparent lack of awareness and strange demeanor during an ABC interview.

Mathis also points to the absurdity of the story that Cosby gave the accuser a pill for anxiety, claiming it was Benadryl, which he states is an antihistamine, not an anti-anxiety medication. He notes that the accuser willingly took the pill, and questions the scenario of accepting unknown pills from a new acquaintance. Mathis speculates that Cosby might be unaware of what’s happening due to age or illness, or is being used by “directors” who are perpetuating a “con.”

The inclusion of five other women testifying against Cosby is also criticized as a deviation from real trial procedures, suggesting their testimonies were hearsay not properly vetted. Mathis asserts that their accusations should have been separate cases. He argues that Harrison Snyder’s belief in these women, based on them seeming “trustworthy,” is not a legal or rational basis, especially without rigorous cross-examination.

The trial judge, Steven O’Neill, failing to file a post-trial opinion is presented as another clue to a fraudulent trial, with Mathis dismissing the idea that this could delay an appeal. Finally, Mathis questions the charge of “aggravated indecent assault,” noting that it’s a unique Pennsylvania statute that applies only to children under 16. Given the accuser’s age at the time of the alleged event, Mathis concludes it was legally impossible for Cosby to be charged with this crime in Pennsylvania in 2018, rendering the trial fake.

Mathis concludes that the agenda behind these fabricated stories is to promote a “men-are-pigs” narrative, aimed at splitting sexes and encouraging consumerism by keeping people single and miserable. He views these “show trials” as diversions from more important real-world events, such as the looting of global treasuries, which are often ignored by the media. He compares this to other historical events like the Salem Witch trials and the Lindbergh baby kidnapping, which were used to distract from other news. The delayed conviction of Cosby is seen as a tactic to keep the story in the headlines for an extended period.

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Graph View