ADKO

clif

5 min read

This article, “Slaying of a Ghost Child” by Coyote Weeds, critiques the narrative surrounding the 1973 killing of Clifford Glover by NYC police, arguing that the official story, as presented in the book “The Trial of Patrolman Thomas Shea” by Thomas Hauser, is filled with inconsistencies and fabricated elements. The author suggests that the case is being used for “race war agitprop” and that the media and legal proceedings were designed to inflame racial tensions.

The author scrutinizes details from Hauser’s book, questioning the background and actions of Patrolman Thomas Shea and his partner Walter Scot, the circumstances of the shooting, and the subsequent trial. The article also delves into the alleged activities of groups like the Black Liberation Army (BLA), questioning the veracity of reported incidents and the backgrounds of prominent figures associated with them, such as Eldridge Cleaver and Assata Shakur. The author also casts doubt on the credibility of various individuals and organizations involved, including Rev. Herbert Daughtry, Robert J. Mangum, and the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association.

The article highlights discrepancies in burial locations, family records, and trial proceedings, suggesting a deliberate obfuscation of facts. It also draws parallels to other controversial events and figures, implying a larger, orchestrated narrative of deception. The author concludes that the entire case, from the shooting to the trial and its aftermath, is a “farce” designed to manipulate public perception.

Here is a list of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc. from the text, marked with double square brackets:

This article, “Slaying of a Ghost Child” by Coyote Weeds, critiques the narrative surrounding the 1973 killing of Clifford Glover by NYC police, arguing that the official story, as presented in the book “The Trial of Patrolman Thomas Shea” by Thomas Hauser, is filled with inconsistencies and fabricated elements. The author suggests that the case is being used for “race war agitprop” and that the media and legal proceedings were designed to inflame racial tensions.

The author scrutinizes details from Hauser’s book, questioning the background and actions of Patrolman Thomas Shea and his partner Walter Scot, the circumstances of the shooting, and the subsequent trial. The article also delves into the alleged activities of groups like the Black Liberation Army (BLA), questioning the veracity of reported incidents and the backgrounds of prominent figures associated with them, such as Eldridge Cleaver and Assata Shakur. The author also casts doubt on the credibility of various individuals and organizations involved, including Rev. Herbert Daughtry, Robert J. Mangum, and the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association.

The article highlights discrepancies in burial locations, family records, and trial proceedings, suggesting a deliberate obfuscation of facts. It also draws parallels to other controversial events and figures, implying a larger, orchestrated narrative of deception. The author concludes that the entire case, from the shooting to the trial and its aftermath, is a “farce” designed to manipulate public perception.

The article mentions:

Graph View