ADKO

chut

4 min read

This article, “Trump Indictments are Theater” by Miles Mathis, argues that the indictments against Donald Trump are a staged performance, not genuine legal proceedings. The author claims that Tanya Chutkan, the judge assigned to the case, is being presented as a “tough punisher” of J6 Rioters based on fabricated information. Mathis asserts that there were no actual J6 rioters and that individuals are not incarcerated as reported. Instead, he suggests that these events are orchestrated by intelligence actors, possibly from Langley (referring to the CIA).

The author scrutinizes Tanya Chutkan’s background, questioning her judicial record and affiliations. He points out her connection to a law firm that included Hunter Biden, her past role as an attorney for Theranos, and inconsistencies in her Senate confirmation vote. Mathis also questions the legal basis of the charges against Trump, arguing that questioning election results falls under free speech and should not be a felony.

Further casting doubt on the legitimacy of the proceedings, Mathis investigates Chutkan’s family connections, including her husband, Peter Krauthamer, and her mother, Noelle. He highlights discrepancies in their public records and suggests possible hidden affiliations, including links to Jamaica and a name variation (Chaitkin) that he associates with Anton Chaitkin. He also brings up a connection to Imran Awan, a Pakistani individual arrested on federal charges in 2017, with whom Chutkan presided over a case. Mathis speculates about a potential relationship or identity overlap between Imran Awan and an Imran Chutkan.

The article suggests that the indictments are a tactic to encourage self-censorship and deter people from expressing dissent online, citing a Chicago Tribune report on social media posts being used to seek stricter sentences for J6 defendants. Mathis maintains that the Constitution protects free speech and that the legal processes described are nonsensical and indicative of a staged event. He contrasts these supposed proceedings with real court procedures, emphasizing the lack of jury involvement in sentencing and the procedural rules that real judges must follow.

The author also references a story about Zachary Rehl, a Marine allegedly facing a lengthy prison sentence for his involvement in the J6 events. He claims Rehl and his comrade Joe Biggs are being stripped of military benefits and subjected to inhumane conditions, which he deems impossible and a tactic to scare military personnel into compliance. Mathis concludes that the entire narrative surrounding the J6 events and the Trump indictments is a vast fiction orchestrated by Langley and the Pentagon in conjunction with Hollywood, likening it to the staged trials of Alex Jones and O. J. Simpson.

Finally, the article criticizes the film Oppenheimer, calling it propaganda underwritten by the Defense Department and suggesting that the Trinity nuclear test footage was also a Hollywood production by Lookout Mountain Film Studio. Mathis expresses his intention to watch the film but refuses to pay for it, anticipating its release on the internet.

Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Graph View