Here’s a summary of the provided text with the requested annotations:
This article by Miles Mathis argues that much of English history, particularly the War of the Roses and the reigns of the Tudors and Stuarts, has been rewritten by the Stanleys. Mathis uses Shakespeare’s lines about Jack of Norfolk and Dickon as a starting point, suggesting that Richard III’s death at the Battle of Bosworth Field was faked, with him being “bought and sold” rather than double-crossed and killed. This staged battle, Mathis contends, was a cover to place the Tudors on the throne as fronts for the Stanleys, who had already established claims through intermarriage with the Nevilles.
A key piece of evidence presented is the inheritance of the Lordship of Glamorgan by Anne Neville, wife of Richard III. Mathis argues that upon her death, Glamorgan should have reverted to a Neville heir, specifically Eleanor Neville (wife of Thomas Stanley, 1st Earl of Derby), not Henry VII or Jasper Tudor. This points to Henry VII being a Stanley/(Neville) and that Glamorgan passed to Thomas Stanley through Eleanor Neville, who was alive at the time, and then to his son Henry VII. The author suggests that the primary goal of the fake Battle of Bosworth Field was to capture Glamorgan without a fight.
Mathis then extends this theory to the executions of Anne Boleyn and Catherine Howard, suggesting their deaths were also faked. He points to their “devilish spirit” and “gay” demeanor before execution, their burial in unmarked graves at the Tower of London, and the questionable identifications of skeletons as evidence of fraud. He argues that the lack of proper burials and the ability of the Howards to quickly regain favor after supposed treasonous acts further support the idea of faked deaths. Mathis also proposes that Henry VIII’s son, Henry FitzRoy, Duke of Richmond and Somerset, had his death faked, possibly due to being gay and unable to produce heirs.
The article further examines the Howard family’s alleged plots and supposed executions, including Henry Howard, Earl of Surrey and Philip Howard, 4th Duke of Norfolk. Mathis claims that these executions were also faked, evidenced by the family’s swift return to favor and titles, and the suspicious circumstances surrounding their burials. He connects the Howards and the Tudors as being essentially the same family, suggesting that supposed plots against the Tudors were either internal family matters or designed to warn genuine plotters.
Mathis also delves into the history of the Stanleys as “Kings of Man” and Lords of the Isles, suggesting they outrank kings and queens and have manipulated British history for centuries. He links them to early Viking invaders and Phoenician families, finding their symbols on coats of arms. He also connects the de Courcy family to Charlemagne and Phoenician lineages.
Finally, Mathis speculates on the modern-day connections to these historical lines, including Ron Howard, Bryce Dallas Howard, and John Winston Lennon, noting his mother’s maiden name was Stanley. He also mentions Jack Ruby’s attorney, Thomas Howard, as a potential link. The article repeatedly emphasizes “numerology” and symbolic signaling, particularly with “eights and aces” and the Phoenix symbol, as methods used by these powerful families to communicate their control.