ADKO

bog

3 min read

Here’s a summary of the text with the requested annotations:

The author, Miles Mathis, discusses a class-action lawsuit filed against big-six scientific publishers (ELSEVIER, WOLTERS KLUWER, JOHN WILEY & SONS, INC., SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC., TAYLOR & FRANCIS GROUP, SPRINGER NATURE) for alleged collusion, racketeering, and violations of the Sherman Antitrust Act. Mathis sees this lawsuit as validation of his long-held criticisms of the scientific publishing system, which he believes is corrupt and stifles progress. He argues that scientists have been too passive in challenging this system, unlike himself, who chose to publish directly online to bypass publishers. Mathis asserts that his success in outranking established entities like Wikipedia and Britannica demonstrates the viability of direct publishing. He likens the publishers’ actions to corporate raiding, citing the example of Steward Healthcare, Cerberus Capital, and its leadership (Richard Gere type, Dan Quayle, John Snow, Steve Feinberg), and their alleged predatory business practices in Malta. Mathis contrasts his own freedom and copyright ownership with the servitude of mainstream scientists. He also addresses why he receives no support from mainstream physics, citing Eric Weinstein’s comments about “PhD trolls” hunting dissenters, though Mathis claims these attacks come from anonymous groups rather than named individuals. He dismisses critiques of his work, which include nuclear diagrams, Solar Cycle predictions, Bode solution, Rayleigh equation, unification papers, quantum spin equation, meson unification, rainbow theory, and Relativity, as shallow and indicative of science’s decline. Mathis shares an email from a supporter who echoes his views on the corrupt system and praises his work, and a negative email from an anonymous sender who resorts to insults and personal attacks, which Mathis interprets as proof of his thesis. He concludes that his direct publishing method circumvents the “beast” of the established system, regardless of its perceived power.

Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Graph View