ADKO

awake

6 min read

The text critiques the film “The Great Awakening” by Mikki Willis, arguing that despite appearing to be on the “right side,” it is not what it seems. The author, Miles Mathis, suggests that the film, which heavily features G. Edward Griffin, is part of a larger agenda to control opposition and delay a “last-minute revolution” as a WEF-aligned “Mordor” future is installed.

Mathis points to the extensive use of editing and technology in the film, raising suspicions about who is funding Willis. He questions Griffin’s narrative, particularly his focus on “Communists” being behind everything, drawing parallels to Joseph McCarthy’s red scare tactics. Mathis suggests that Griffin, who has a long history in media and politics, including working for the Wallace campaign and being associated with the John Birch Society (JBS), is not a genuine conspiracy theorist but rather a controlled operative.

Further connections are drawn between Griffin and intelligence figures like Maj. Gen. John Singlaub (OSS, CIA) and John Rees (British spy, police informant), who also allegedly had ties to author Grace Metalious. Mathis implies that Metalious’s work, like “Peyton Place,” may have been a government project.

The author then expands on this theme of controlled opposition by linking Griffin to Lawrence Patton McDonald (US Representative, Joseph McCarthy protege) and the Mises Institute, which Alex Jones also draws from. He also notes the involvement of Mark McDonald (psychiatrist), suggesting a possible relation to Lawrence Patton McDonald.

The financial backing for these figures is traced to the Scaife family, specifically Richard Mellon Scaife, highlighting his connections to powerful industries and banks like Mellon Bank, Gulf Oil, and Alcoa. Mathis asserts that wealthy “Jewish bankers” are the true power behind Griffin and Willis, not champions of individual rights.

The article also casts suspicion on other figures featured in the film:

Mathis re-examines the John Birch Society, arguing that despite its valid points on issues like fluoride, it is a controlled opposition funded by billionaires like Robert Welch, Harry Lynde Bradley (connected to Rockwell, Allen-Bradley), and Fred Chase Koch. He also mentions Robert Waring Stoddard (founder of Wyman Gordon) and Revilo Pendleton Oliver (OSS, CIA, National Review), who promoted anti-unionism and the idea of Lee Harvey Oswald being part of a Soviet conspiracy.

The author concludes that the film is likely a “stalling tactic” to control dissent as a globalist agenda is implemented. He suggests that the focus on Communism and China is propaganda designed to instill fear and encourage ineffective grassroots political involvement, while those in power consolidate control by manipulating the food supply, introducing private armies, and increasing reliance on technology.

A secondary possibility explored is that some powerful factions, like certain billionaires, may oppose the WEF’s one-world government model if it mirrors China’s less profitable economic system, which offers fewer opportunities for wealth extraction compared to Western economies. The article ends by highlighting the potential economic downfall of a world run by AI, which cannot be taxed or engage in the current capitalist models of war funding and consumerism.

Here is a list of identified subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc.:

Graph View