This article by Miles Mathis critiques the 2009 atheist bus campaign in the UK, questioning its authenticity and claiming it was part of a larger, centuries-long agenda to dismantle religion. Mathis argues that the campaign, featuring slogans like “God probably doesn’t exist,” was not a genuine grassroots movement driven by scientists or celebrities like Ariane Sherine and Richard Dawkins, but rather a government-funded project orchestrated by “Jewish suspects.” He posits that the campaign’s true purpose is to facilitate the secularization of society and seize control of religious institutions, a project he traces back to Henry VIII and continuing through figures like Ben Franklin. Mathis also delves into the alleged hidden backgrounds and family connections of Sherine and Dawkins, linking them to prominent and powerful families and suggesting their involvement in this anti-religious agenda is not coincidental but orchestrated. He further criticizes the “evidence” presented by atheists, finding it lacks scientific rigor, and draws parallels to his previous work on the Theosophy Project. Mathis concludes that the campaign, and atheism in general, is a tool used by powerful entities, referred to as the Phoenician Navy, to control and manipulate the public, preventing them from seeking genuine independence and critical thought. He also references Margaret Atwood’s observation that such campaigns are akin to religion, selling a product of secularization and state control.

Here is a list of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc. found in the text, marked with double square brackets:

The article by Miles Mathis critiques the 2009 atheist bus campaign in the UK, questioning its authenticity and claiming it was part of a larger, centuries-long agenda to dismantle religion. Mathis argues that the campaign, featuring slogans like “God probably doesn’t exist,” was not a genuine grassroots movement driven by scientists or celebrities like Ariane Sherine and Richard Dawkins, but rather a government-funded project orchestrated by “Jewish suspects.” He posits that the campaign’s true purpose is to facilitate the secularization of society and seize control of religious institutions, a project he traces back to Henry VIII and continuing through figures like Ben Franklin. Mathis also delves into the alleged hidden backgrounds and family connections of Sherine and Dawkins, linking them to prominent and powerful families and suggesting their involvement in this anti-religious agenda is not coincidental but orchestrated. He further criticizes the “evidence” presented by atheists, finding it lacks scientific rigor, and draws parallels to his previous work on the Theosophy Project. Mathis concludes that the campaign, and atheism in general, is a tool used by powerful entities, referred to as the Phoenician Navy, to control and manipulate the public, preventing them from seeking genuine independence and critical thought. He also references Margaret Atwood’s observation that such campaigns are akin to religion, selling a product of secularization and state control.