This article, “Amanda Knox” by Miles Mathis, published on August 23, 2025, argues that the Amanda Knox case was a staged event to cover for the supposed faked death of Meredith Kercher, who may have gone undercover for MI6. The author claims to have solved this theory in approximately twenty minutes by reviewing Wikipedia pages for knox and Kercher.
Mathis asserts that the name Amanda Knox is Jewish, and knox herself appears to be of Jewish descent, suggesting her looks were intended to distract from Kercher. He also connects the name Meredith Kercher to Jewish heritage and notes that Kercher’s father, John Kercher, was a journalist and writer capable of contributing to the narrative of the event, including articles for the Daily Mail.
The author speculates about Amanda Knox’s family background, mentioning her father Curt Knox’s position at Macy’s and her mother Edda Mellas, whose maiden name he suggests might be Huff. He notes the apparent scrubbing of information regarding Edda Huff and Harley Huff from public records, implying a cover-up. He also mentions knox’s marriage to a Sutherland, a name linked to Scottish peers and Stuarts, and the possibility of marrying a cousin.
Mathis points to the date of the alleged murder, November 1, 2007 (All Saints Day), and knox’s first meeting with her lawyer on November 11 as numerological clues suggesting a staged event. He criticizes the speed of knox’s arrest, four days after the event, as indicative of a pre-scripted investigation.
The article identifies Giuliano Mignini, the prosecutor, as an “Italian superspook” connected to intelligence agencies. The author references Douglas Preston’s book “Trial by Fury” to suggest Mignini was involved in manufacturing a “Satanic Sex Cult” story, similar to theories discussed in previous papers by Donny Ahzmond regarding the Satanic Panic. Mathis criticizes Mignini’s tactics, comparing them to those of Vincent Bugliosi in the Manson case and highlighting a fabricated quote attributed to knox. He argues that the extensive worldwide media coverage, including cameras in the courtroom, points to a staged CIA-type trial, especially if Kercher was involved with CIA or MI6. Mignini’s prior involvement in promoting the Monster of Florence story is also cited as evidence of a fabricated case.
Mathis highlights knox’s double conviction and subsequent overturning of those convictions as further evidence of a prolonged, fabricated narrative designed to distract the public. He notes the European Court of Human Rights’s order for Italy to pay knox €18,400 for violations of her rights after arrest, questioning the adequacy of the compensation for what he deems four years of false prosecution and imprisonment.
Further signs of a fake trial, according to Mathis, include Kercher’s DNA not being found on the murder weapon despite her having been stabbed, and knox’s four-day interrogation without legal counsel, food, water, or sleep, which he characterizes as torture and a denial of basic rights. He also notes that knox, at 20, was not considered a legal adult in Italy (where the age of majority is 21), yet legal proceedings did not account for this. He questions why knox was interrogated for four days if she wasn’t suspected of a crime, especially as an underage individual.
The author expresses skepticism about the lead detective, Monica Napoleoni, a “rookie” put in charge of a major case. He also questions the reported number of wounds sustained by Kercher (47 or 33), associating 47 with the founding year of the CIA. He points out inconsistencies in reports about Napoleoni’s role.
The article then focuses on Rudy Guede, identified as a “black patsy” and convicted of the murder. Mathis suggests Guede’s adoption by a wealthy Perugian family and his background in the Ivory Coast (specifically mentioning Jean Lorougnon Guede University in Daloa, Ivory Coast) as hints towards a manufactured narrative. He draws a parallel to the Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab (underwear bomber) case, linking him to wealthy parents and education at University College London.
Mathis describes Guede’s arrest in Germany and extradition to Italy, his choice of a “fast-track” bench trial presided over by Judge Micheli, and the fact that he did not testify. He argues that this “fast-track” procedure is a hallmark of fake trials.
The article concludes with the supreme court’s admission that the case against knox and her boyfriend, Rudy Guede, was “without foundation” and that no evidence linked them to the crime scene or the victim’s body. Mathis interprets this as confirmation that the entire case was manufactured, leading to the conclusion that Meredith Kercher was not killed and is likely still alive, having faked her death.
The clincher, according to Mathis, is found on Meredith Kercher’s Wikipedia page, which states she was known as “Mez.” He argues this nickname is derived from her flatmate, Laura Mezzetti, who is presented as a fabrication. Mathis claims Laura Mezzetti was actually Meredith Kercher’s MI6 codename, used for her faked death and new identity, likening it to similar alleged deceptions involving Sharon Tate, Nicole Simpson, and Amelia Earhart. He asserts that neither knox nor Guede spent any time in a real jail.
- A note indicates that Amanda Knox was only engaged to a Sutherland and later married a Christopher Robinson.