This article by Miles Mathis argues that the purported “4B Project,” where liberal women are allegedly rejecting sex, dating, marriage, and children in response to the Trump victory, is a staged operation by the CIA to sow division. The author points to the fake name “Tara Bull” and the actions of individuals like “ClareClearly” on TikTok as evidence of this deception, suggesting they are Intel actresses or assets. Mathis claims that these individuals exhibit stereotypical traits of porn stars or paid actors, with their behavior and appearances betraying their alleged motives.

The article then shifts to male figures who, according to Mathis, are also being paid to push this agenda from the opposite side. He criticizes Andrew Tate, Nick Fuentes, and Jon Miller for making divisive and “Piggish” comments related to women’s choices and sexuality, accusing them of promoting a “Men-are-Pigs” narrative.

Finally, Mathis critiques Bill Burr’s recent SNL monologue, deeming it weak and sexist. He takes issue with Burr’s jokes about “ugly women/feminists” and his comments suggesting female politicians should be more revealing in their attire. Mathis contrasts Burr’s current remarks with his past usefulness in the “Save the Males” movement and suggests Burr’s timing was particularly poor given the recent divisive election. He also touches upon his own experiences with feminists, distinguishing between “first wave” equality feminists and “gender feminists,” and expresses a desire for conservative dress from politicians of all genders, mentioning kamala, Nikki Haley, Sarah Palin, Kari Lake, and Hillary as examples. He also names Gavin, Vivek, and Kennedy in relation to this point.

In summary, the article posits that the current discourse around women’s sexual and romantic choices in response to political events is a manufactured plot, involving both female and male operatives, designed to further societal division.

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.: