This article by Miles Mathis, published on November 6, 2024, argues that the Donald Trump victory was not a genuine win but a manipulated outcome designed by the CIA to re-establish parity between the Democratic Party and Republican Party and shift the country further right. Mathis claims that elections are easily manipulated by computers and that the Democratic Party was intentionally weakened with a disastrous platform, while Republicans adopted a populist stance, a departure from their historical “fatcat” image.

The author asserts that the election was “stolen” in the sense that Trump was pre-destined to win as part of this larger plan. He further suggests that the CIA had to artificially make the election appear close by “fudging” results and even securing some states for Kamala Harris to maintain the illusion of parity, claiming she would have won far fewer than the 19 states officially reported. Mathis criticizes Kamala Harris’s qualifications and the Democratic Party’s platform, calling it a “big joke inserted from Langley” and listing various progressive policies he deems absurd.

He contrasts this with his own self-proclaimed “old-school liberal” stance, which he defines as supporting the “little guy” against “fatcats,” and expresses happiness with Trump’s win despite his personal dislike for Trump as a “fatcat.” Mathis believes the CIA manufactured the election on populist ideas for Trump to fool the populace and that reneging on these promises will exacerbate instability. He also criticizes the mainstream media, including Fox, CNN, NBC, and The Guardian, for their perceived biases and “spin,” and mocks pollster Anne Selzer for her inaccurate predictions.

Mathis dismisses Hollywood endorsements as backfiring due to their “scolding, holier-than-thou” nature and suggests these endorsements were scripted to fail. He posits that the CIA needs to maintain division and fear (“Project Chaos”) for the next four years, using labels like “Nazi,” “racist,” and “felon” to keep the public engaged.

The author concludes by questioning the sustainability of the CIA’s “fake history” and the effectiveness of modern warfare, suggesting a shift from military, banking, and spycraft to rebuilding arts, sciences, and public works. He argues that a focus on raw material consumption and military spending has led to societal collapse and proposes that the CIA agents could be re-assigned to more constructive projects, creating new economies and rebuilding trust. Mathis reiterates that the current state of society is a result of decades of flawed priorities and that a change of direction is possible. He urges readers to demand accountability from Trump and his administration regarding campaign promises and to remember the importance of physical action and sustained anger to effect change. He notes that the decline of mainstream media and Hollywood’s influence makes it harder for the rulers to manipulate the public, forcing them to confront public anger more directly. The article ends with a promise to discuss the “fake 4B movement” in the future and a reference to Watership Down.

List of Entities: