adicheo

phoenper

8 min read

This article argues that the Phoenicians, a civilization known for their seafaring and trading, were the true driving force behind many ancient empires and historical events. The author claims that mainstream historical accounts have deliberately obscured the Phoenicians’ pervasive influence by misrepresenting their role, attributing their achievements to other groups, or creating fictional narratives.

The author posits that the Phoenicians held a near-monopoly on iron production, which, combined with their control of shipping and banking, fueled their dominance. They suggest that the “Sea Peoples” who destroyed the Hittite Empire in 1200BC were, in fact, the Phoenicians, equipped with superior iron weapons. This allowed them to spread their influence and technology across the Mediterranean. The author further argues that the Israelites, particularly the Tribe of Asher and Dan, were closely linked to the Phoenicians, with names like “Wesh-ash” and “Dan-yen” pointing to Asher and Dan respectively.

The text criticizes mainstream historians for their supposed inability to place the Sea Peoples, aligning their disappearance with the rise of Phoenicia’s prominence between 1200BC and 800BC. Evidence cited includes silver hoards in Phoenicia with isotopic ratios matching ores in Sardinia and Spain, suggesting trade with Tarshish that supplied King Solomon of Israel. The author dismisses attempts to link the Sherdan (a group of Sea Peoples) to Sardinia or Sardinians, asserting they were Phoenicians, possibly connected to Sidon. The bull’s head artifact from Bahrain’s Barbar Temple, dating to 2000BC, is presented as evidence of Phoenician worship of bulls, linking them to Sardinia and the Sherdan’s horned helmets.

The article further challenges conventional narratives about Persia’s rise, suggesting it was a fabricated entity orchestrated by Phoenicians through strategic marriages and control of royal succession, particularly around Cyrus the Great and Darius. The author claims that Persia’s rapid emergence and global takeover, coinciding with the supposed decline of Phoenicia, is highly suspicious.

The author contends that many ancient Greek city-states, including Thebes, Argos, and Mycenae, were “crypto-Phoenician,” meaning they were secretly controlled by Phoenicians. Cadmus, the founder of Thebes, is acknowledged as Phoenician. The Lydian Empire is also presented as a successor to the Hittite Empire, implying Lydians were Phoenicians.

The text then delves into the actions of Alexander the Great, asserting his conquests were not a genuine military expansion but a “grand Phoenician holiday or gay cruise” designed to solidify Phoenician control over regions like Egypt, Babylon, and Persia. The author points to suspiciously convenient military victories, unexplained naval appearances, and familial ties as evidence of a staged historical narrative.

The article concludes by suggesting that the Phoenicians have a long history of covertly ruling through manipulation, propaganda, and control of treasuries, a tactic that continues to this day through “fake science, fake art, and fake events.” The author expresses frustration with the pervasive dishonesty in historical accounts and the deliberate obfuscation of the Phoenician legacy.

Here is a list of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc. found in the text, marked with double square brackets:

The article argues that the Phoenicians were the true architects of many ancient empires and historical events, a fact deliberately obscured by mainstream historical accounts. The author claims they held a near-monopoly on iron production, shipping, and banking, which fueled their dominance. The “Sea Peoples” who destroyed the Hittite Empire around 1200BC are identified as Phoenicians, spreading iron technology. The Israelites, particularly the Tribe of Asher and Dan, are presented as closely linked to the Phoenicians. The author criticizes mainstream historians for their inability to place the Sea Peoples, whose disappearance coincides with Phoenicia’s rise between 1200BC and 800BC. Evidence includes Phoenician silver hoards linked to Sardinia and Spain, and potential trade with Tarshish for King Solomon of Israel. The Sherdan are identified as Phoenicians, possibly related to Sidon. Artifacts like the bull’s head from Bahrain’s Barbar Temple support this claim.

The author challenges the historical narrative of Persia’s rise, suggesting it was a Phoenician construct, particularly concerning Cyrus the Great and Darius. The rapid expansion of Persia alongside Phoenicia’s supposed decline is deemed suspicious. Ancient Greek city-states like Thebes, Argos, and Mycenae are labeled “crypto-Phoenician,” with Cadmus of Thebes being Phoenician. The Lydian Empire is seen as a successor to the Hittite Empire, implying Lydians were Phoenicians.

Alexander the Great’s conquests are portrayed not as genuine military campaigns but as a “grand Phoenician holiday” to consolidate Phoenician control over Egypt, Babylon, and Persia. Suspicious military victories, naval appearances, and familial ties are cited as evidence of a fabricated history. The author concludes that Phoenicians have consistently ruled covertly through manipulation and propaganda, a practice continuing today with “fake science, fake art, and fake events.” The author criticizes the dishonest historical reporting that obscures the Phoenician legacy.

Key entities mentioned:

Graph View