This text discusses the Oslo gay bar shooting that occurred on June 25, 2022, claiming it was a staged event. The author expresses skepticism towards terror events in general and focuses on perceived inconsistencies and dubious circumstances surrounding the shooting. Key points include the cancellation of Oslo Pride, the number of casualties, the quick apprehension of the perpetrator Zaniar Matapour, and his alleged motivations. The author highlights the alleged presence of Utøya survivors at the shooting, questioning the odds. A significant focus is placed on a victim, Nikita Abbas, whose initial account of being shot was reportedly admitted to be fabricated by mainstream Norwegian media, exemplified by a front page of Aftenposten. The author scrutinizes the medical plausibility of other victims’ injuries, particularly gunshot wounds to the head, and questions the perpetrator’s choice of clothing and the actions of civilians and police during his capture. The text also delves into the backgrounds of individuals connected to the event, including Tormod Bakke Johnsen and his wealthy friend Kristin H. Andresen, whose husband Johan H. Andresen jr. heads the company Ferd. The author also investigates Zaniar Matapour’s past, including his alleged connection to comedian Kristian Valen and his changed name to Samuel Stefa. Furthermore, Arfan Bhatti, accused of contributing to the shooting, is discussed, along with his alleged involvement with the organization Profetens Ummah and past gang affiliations. Connections are drawn between Bhatti, his ex-wife, and crime journalist Karianne Solbrække, and Olav Rønneberg, a crime journalist and witness. The author also examines the legal defense team for Matapour, John Christian Elden, Bernt Heiberg, and Inger Silka Zadig, pointing out their alleged Jewish heritage and past involvement in other high-profile cases. The disappearance of American witnesses Gary and Ginger Walters is also noted. Finally, the IT professional Bjørn Inge Bergestuen and his alleged connection to the Progress Party are mentioned. The author concludes that the evidence presented suggests the event was staged.
Here is a list of subjects, names, references, locations, companies, etc. marked with double square brackets:
The Oslo gay bar shooting was a shooting that occurred on the night of the 25th of June 2022 at around 1 am. The incident took place at the London Pub, Per på Hjørnet, and a takeaway restaurant, all located in Rosenkrantz’ street in Oslo, Norway. Oslo Pride, scheduled for the following day, was cancelled due to the shooting. According to Wikipedia, 2 people were killed and at least 21 were wounded. The perpetrator, identified as an Iranian immigrant named Zaniar Matapour, was apprehended by locals and then the police. Matapour is under investigation for alleged Islamic extremist terrorism motivated by anti-LGBT sentiments.
The author notes that many individuals present at the bars on the night of the shooting were also present at Utøya in 2011 during the shooting by Anders Behring Breivik at a Labor Party youth camp. Eskil Pederen, former leader of the Labor Party youth organization, and at least two other Utøya survivors, Eivind Rindal and Stan Løken, have reportedly recounted fleeing from shots again during the Oslo gay bar shooting. The author questions the odds of this occurring and suggests the shooting was staged.
Despite initial apprehension due to a perceived lack of material and boredom with “mass-produced fake events,” the author was prompted to write after reports surfaced that one victim had admitted to lying about being shot. The article mentions a front page from Aftenposten, a major Norwegian newspaper, featuring Nikita Abbas and her story of being shot. The text on the page reads, “She was hit by one of the bullets. Her friend used his own body as a shield to save Nikita Amber Abbas (21) from the shower of bullets at the London Pub Friday night. The bullet went through them both.” The author deems this story a fabrication, citing its admission in mainstream news and questioning the plausibility of a bullet passing through two people. The author speculates that this may have been a deliberate attempt to “blackwash the gay Muslim organization she heads or Muslims in general.”
The author notes that few newspapers reported Abbas’s admission of lying, and attempts to access her original story online lead to errors rather than retractions. An archived version of the article on the way back machine is mentioned, where Abbas, described as disabled and using a wheelchair, recounts her experience and how she did not notice being shot. The article also states that the emergency room called her to check if she had been shot because they couldn’t find the bullet in her friend. The author finds these details illogical and questions why she wasn’t checked by paramedics.
The author further examines other victims, referencing an article with a victim who claimed to be shot in the back of the head, with the bullet exiting the other side with seemingly minimal damage. The author questions the reality of this, noting the absence of visible swelling or oedema and the bullet not lodging in the head. Another victim is presented as having survived a gunshot wound to the head and appearing to be in good condition, with clean wounds and no swelling. Citing the American Associaton of Neurological Surgeons, the author states that head gunshot wounds are lethal 90% of the time, and 50% of survivors experience seizures. The author questions the odds of two head gunshot victims from the Oslo shooting surviving and appearing relatively well, concluding this further evidence of the event being fake.
A video of the perpetrator Zaniar Matapour being captured by civilians is mentioned. He is described as wearing a yellow T-shirt, which the author speculates might have been chosen for easy identification. The author questions the narrative of civilians apprehending an armed man on a shooting rampage, suggesting it is presented to portray civilian courage rather than indicate authenticity. A picture of Matapour in a yellow shirt and blue cap is shown, with the author sarcastically remarking on his apparent attire for criminal activity.
The presence of a police car in the video of the capture is noted, with blue lights visible. The author contrasts the official timeline of civilians holding Matapour for 4 minutes and 31 seconds before police intervention with the perceived delay in police response and reports of police being seen further down the street. The author questions why backup police forces were sent to the wrong address despite officers being present at the scene.
A witness, Tormod Bakke Johnsen, who is gay, reported that Zaniar Matapour screamed “allahu akbar” before opening fire. Johnsen’s friend, Kristin H. Andresen, is mentioned as receiving a text message from him about the shooting. Kristin H. Andresen is identified as the wife of Johan H. Andresen jr., one of Norway’s richest men and head of the holding company Ferd, which has a net worth of 24 billion NOK (in 2010). The author, referencing Miles’s previous work, suggests this connection is not coincidental.
Regarding Zaniar Matapour’s background, Wikipedia is cited, stating he immigrated to Norway from Iran as a refugee in 1993. His family allegedly fled Iran during the revolution in 1979 and then to Pakistan before reaching Norway. The author dismisses this as a “sob story” and suggests Matapour is connected to others in the “staged saga.” It is mentioned that his sister dated Kristian Valen, a well-known Norwegian comedian who claimed to be assaulted by Matapour years prior. The police reportedly had evidence of the assault but did not charge Matapour.
The author states that Matapour changed his name to Samuel Stefa at some point, though the reason is unknown. Wikipedia is cited for his criminal record of drug possession and violent assault. The Police Security Service had reportedly contacted him several times due to concerns about radicalization. The author dismisses the radicalization claim, suggesting Matapour might be a paid agent of Norwegian intelligence services. Since 2013, Matapour has been on disability benefits, reportedly diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia, which the author suggests is used to explain his name change. Matapour was also a neighbor and acquaintance of Arfan Bhat, another Norwegian Islamic radical, who has been charged with contributing to the Oslo 2022 shooting. Bhatti’s involvement is described as unclear, beyond posting images on facebook related to rainbow fags. The Norwegian Islamist organization Profetens Ummah, with which Bhatti has been involved, is described as supportive of Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and Islamic terrorism, and is speculated to be a CIA-created ISIS franchise. The author notes Bhatti’s past membership in a gang called “Young Guns” and conflicts with other Oslo “underworld” gangs like “The Killers,” “B-gjengen,” “Philippine Outsiders,” and “Rebels,” questioning the cartoon-like names of these groups.
A connection is made between Arfan Bhatti’s ex-wife, who was vocal against covid measures and promoted holy war, and the potential for associating opposition to covid measures with Islamic radicalism. The author also mentions that Arfan Bhatti dated Karianne Solbrække, a Norwegian crime news journalist who covered the Orderud case. The author presents this as “proof positive” that Bhatti and therefore Matapour are agents, stating that real Iranian terrorists do not date “pretty blonde State news reporters.”
A journalist from NRK (Norwegian public broadcaster), Olav Rønneberg, is mentioned as witnessing a man arrive with a bag, pick up a weapon, and start shooting. Rønneberg, NRK’s crime journalist, is noted as being the second crime news journalist linked to the Oslo shooting, either as a coverer or as an ex-girlfriend of someone charged in the case. The author speculates on a possible relation between Olav Rønneberg and a famous wealthy Norwegian Rønneberg family, noting members like army officer Joachim Holmboe Rønneberg and Erling Rønneberg, an agent for the Secret Intelligence Service involved in the WW2 Norwegian heavy water sabotage. The Holmboe family is also mentioned as influential. Miles is cited as having mentioned the Holmboe family in his papers on the Breivik event. The author also notes that Olav Rønneberg has covered the Orderud case. Miles adds a comment that the Ronnebergs are Jewish and related to Sandbergs, Brinchmanns, Rasmussens, Cochs, and Schous.
The lead defense attorney for Zaniar Matapour, John Christian Elden, is described as a well-known lawyer involved in high-profile cases. He is noted as a member of the conservative party, a freemason, a participant in the US State department IV leadership program in 2005, and an honorary citizen of Nebraska. His granduncle, Oscar C. Gundersen, was a Labor Party member, Minister of Justice, Norwegian ambassador to Russia, and was controversial for aiding the Germans during WW2. The author questions Elden’s participation in the US State department program and his granduncle’s controversial past. Elden has also worked on the Orderud case.
Another defense attorney for Matapour is Bernt Heiberg, who, along with Elden, has previously defended Arfan Bhatti. Heiberg is described as a member of the Heiberg family, a well-known surname mentioned by Miles in relation to the Breivik event. The third defense attorney is Inger Silka Zadig, who has also worked on the Orderud case. The author asserts that all these attorneys are Jewish. Zadig is a variant of the Hebrew “Tzadik,” meaning “righteous.” Elden is a common Jewish name, and Heiberg is also a common Jewish name, with examples of Johanne Heiberg and Johan Heiberg mentioned, along with their familial connections to prominent figures and alleged involvement in a “fake” assassination. The author suggests that these “fakes run in families.”
An American couple, Gary (65) and Ginger Walters (64) from North Carolina, who filmed victims receiving medical assistance, are mentioned. The author and Miles were unable to find them using people search engines, suggesting they may not be who they claim to be.
Bjørn Inge Bergestuen, whose friend was allegedly shot and killed by Matapour, is identified as an IT professional for the Norwegian Progress Party, a populist right-wing party. The author speculates that this position might indicate party membership and suggests that the Progress Party benefits from the perception of Islamic terrorism as a problem, despite being vocal against it.
The author concludes that the presented evidence strongly suggests the Oslo gay bar shooting was staged and may add more details later if deemed noteworthy.
*A footnote references a previous discussion about Gustav III of Sweden, his lineage, and his supposed assassination.