adicheo

newton

13 min read

This text presents a highly critical and conspiratorial view of Isaac Newton, challenging conventional historical narratives about his life, achievements, and ancestry. The author, Miles Mathis, claims that Newton’s supposed genius was heavily augmented by his extensive royal and noble lineage, which he meticulously details, tracing Newton’s ancestry back to figures like Charlemagne and King David of Scotland.

Mathis argues that Newton’s biography has been deliberately “scrubbed” by historical accounts and genealogical sites like thepeerage.com and Geni to hide these connections and present him as a self-made man. The author suggests Newton was a “peer” and a member of powerful, potentially “crypto-Jewish” families, implying his career and discoveries were orchestrated.

The text scrutinizes Newton’s scientific contributions, particularly his work on calculus and the reflecting telescope, asserting that he did not invent them but rather built upon or stole the ideas of others. Mathis also alleges that Newton’s writings on religious matters, prophecy, and alchemy were part of a project to sow discord and promote Jewish interests, a claim supported by his examination of Newton’s biblical interpretations and his posthumous ownership of Newton’s religious papers by Abraham Shalom Yahuda.

Furthermore, Mathis posits that Newton was involved in espionage and possibly headed British Intelligence, using his position at the Royal Mint as a cover. He also claims Newton’s knighthood was not for scientific merit but for his intelligence work. The author criticizes the historical promotion of Newton’s work, suggesting it has led to a suppression of alternative scientific theories and a decline in genuine scientific inquiry.

The author’s analysis is characterized by a focus on numerology (e.g., “Chai,” “aces and eights”), repeated claims of “scrubbing” of genealogical information, and the assertion that many historical figures and events were orchestrated by clandestine groups, referred to as the “Phoenician Navy” or “Jewish lines,” for profit and control. The text also critiques the traditional understanding of the calculus, proposing Mathis’s own method as a superior alternative.

Summary with marked entities:

The article by Miles Mathis presents a revisionist history of Isaac Newton, challenging the narrative of his solitary genius and instead highlighting his extensive royal and noble ancestry. Mathis traces Newton’s lineage back to figures like Charlemagne, King David of Scotland, and Odin, suggesting his rise was facilitated by powerful families, some of which are cryptically linked to Jewish origins. The author criticizes genealogical sites like Geneanet, thepeerage.com, and Geni for allegedly “scrubbing” Newton’s family tree to conceal these connections.

Mathis questions Newton’s academic credentials and achievements, suggesting his degrees from Trinity College, Cambridge were questionable and that his inventions, like the reflecting telescope, were not original. He also claims Newton’s work on calculus was flawed and that he suppressed the work of others, notably Robert Hooke, whom Newton, as head of the Royal Society, allegedly had his papers “disappeared.”

The author delves into Newton’s religious views, calling him an Arian and potentially a Socinian, and suggests his theological writings were part of a project to cause “discord and division,” possibly serving Jewish interests. Mathis points to Newton’s involvement with prophecy and his interpretation of biblical texts as evidence of this agenda.

Furthermore, Mathis alleges Newton was involved in espionage, potentially heading British Intelligence, with his role at the Royal Mint serving as a cover. His knighthood, Mathis claims, was not for scientific achievements but for this covert work. The article also critiques Newton’s promotion of his own work, arguing it has stifled further scientific progress and led to a decline in genuine theorizing, replaced by a “mechanistic view of the cosmos” that displaces God.

The author repeatedly uses numerology (e.g., “Chai,” “1/18,” “11/11”) and conspiratorial language, suggesting a hidden hand controlled by “Phoenician families” and “Jewish lines” manipulating history for profit and power. The text also touches upon figures like John Constable, Bill Clinton, Andre Rivet, Catherine de’ Medicis, Henry IV of France, James I of England, Prince Henry, Charles II of England, Robert Walpole, Charles Montagu, 1st Earl of Halifax, and Queen Anne within the context of these alleged conspiracies. Mathis proposes his own theories on calculus and gravity as superior to Newton’s.

List of Subjects, Names, References, Locations, Companies, etc.:

Graph View