adicheo

jeffers

20 min read

Here’s a summary of the provided text, with all identified entities marked with double square brackets:

This text, “Thomas Jefferson, Part One” by Miles Mathis, argues that Thomas Jefferson and other Founding Fathers were not revolutionaries or democrats, but rather were deeply entrenched in European aristocracy and engaged in a complex web of power, manipulation, and control. The author claims that mainstream historical accounts, like those on Wikipedia, deliberately obscure these connections.

Mathis asserts that Jefferson was descended from numerous noble and royal European families, tracing his lineage through his mother, Jane Randolph, to prominent English and Scottish houses like the Randolphs, Stewarts, FitzAlans, and Erskines. He suggests that Jefferson’s aristocratic background explains his actions and motivations. The author highlights alleged connections to figures like John of Gaunt multiple times through various maternal and paternal lines, including Fullers, Nevills, Beauforts, and Stanleys. He also points to alleged links to H. H. Rogers and Standard Oil through the Rogers surname.

The text criticizes Jefferson’s personal life, particularly his marriage to Martha Wayles, his alleged relationship with Sally Hemings, and his treatment of his daughters, whom he sent to convents. Jefferson’s role in the Revolutionary War is downplayed, with the author suggesting he was an unknown and somewhat reluctant participant, chosen to draft the Declaration of Independence by default. The election of the Continental Congress is questioned, with the author arguing delegates were self-appointed rather than elected by the people, thus undermining the concept of representative democracy.

The author also analyzes other key figures, including Roger Sherman, Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, and R. R. Livingston, the other members of the Committee of Five who drafted the Declaration of Independence. He argues that they, too, were part of this aristocratic network, not genuine revolutionaries. Sherman’s lack of legal training but success in passing the bar, and his abstention from signing the Declaration of Independence, are highlighted as suspicious. Adams is portrayed as a “cloaked Tory” and “fascist,” whose family lines also connect to the aristocracy. Livingston’s role as Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of New York and his unconfirmed attendance at the signing of the Declaration of Independence are also noted.

The text delves into the historical context, suggesting that Protestantism itself was a tool for nobles to splinter Christianity and that the American Revolution was not a genuine fight for freedom but a power struggle orchestrated by entities like the East India Company and aristocratic factions. The author claims the US was founded by a Komnene/Vasa/Jagiellon faction, not a Habsburg/Medici/Bourbon/Guise faction, explaining the nation’s Protestant origins and historical anti-Catholic sentiment.

Furthermore, the author critiques the contemporary political and social landscape, arguing that current rulers are perpetuating a system of control and exploitation, using manufactured misery to maintain power and profit. He contrasts the idealized 1950s with the current “nightmare” of media and culture. The text concludes by reiterating that Thomas Jefferson and his contemporaries were part of a long-standing aristocratic project, not champions of the common people. A recent addition notes Jefferson’s confirmed Phoenician markers through DNA testing, linking him to ancient seafaring peoples.

List of Entities:

Graph View